Posted on 12/12/2003 12:05:21 AM PST by yonif
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:40:59 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The White House yesterday said a new immigration review is under way that could lead to amnesty for millions of illegal aliens living and working in the United States.
Confirmation of the review came during a White House briefing, just two days after Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge said during a town hall meeting in Miami that the government had to "afford some kind of legal status" to the 8 million to 12 million illegal aliens in the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Isn't this something? The Democratic Party is in disarray and it seems it will not nominate someone who cares about jobs, supporting average US citizens, etc. So, now there is talk about supporting the invasion.
Coincidence?...not a chance.
It's an American principle that the law applys to everyone regardless of ethnicity. Immigrants are elevated to equality when the law views them as such. It's not good for the country to let any group become a permanent "other" never perceived as just American. We've had a lot of that in our history and most of it was the result of racism.
Fortunately for Republicans, Democrats aren't much better but they are getting better advice,
"New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson (D) offered some pretty good advice to his own party. Referring to Hispanic voters independent streak, the Chairman of the 2004 Democrat Convention warned his party against taking Hispanic voters for granted and urged them to move beyond issues like immigration and [instead] stress economic concerns, including job creation and entrepreneurship.
It sounds like Richardson actually knows something about Hispanic voters, who make up 43% of the state he governs. The question is whether his party will pay him any heed." ( Raul Damas, director of operations at Opiniones Latinas)
Economic concerns, job creation and entrepreneurship are things that have no ethnic boundaries, they aren't divisive and they don't promote contempt for the law.
Gangs threat: 'Extreme' By Jon Echtenkamp 12/09/2003
Northern Virginians can expect a rising tide of violent crimes committed by street gangs that have established "a major hub" in this area, as more gang members possibly numbering in the thousands may flock here from Central America, according to a recently issued FBI report. The report specifically focuses on the rise of the most notorious of the gangs known to operate in this area, Mara Salvatrucha 13, or MS-13. The gang, with roots in El Salvador and Los Angeles, established a foothold in this region in the early 1990s and has been responsible for untold violent crimes over the years. The FBI estimates that some 3,000 MS-13 members and 30 MS-13 cliques are operating in the Washington, D.C., area, primarily in the prosperous Northern Virginia suburbs. "The greater Washington, D.C., area, and specifically northern Virginia, is now a major hub of MS-13 gang activity," the report says. "Violent crime associated with continued expansion of MS-13 is most predictable." The report serves as a wake-up call, even as federal, state and local law enforcement officials are implementing a broad array of programs to combat the rapid growth of gangs here. In language that is all the more startling because it comes from the FBI, the report notes that MS-13 groups "pose a serious threat in the United States and abroad due to their propensity for extreme random acts of violence and involvement in myriad criminal activities." Those crimes include shootings, rape, armed robberies, theft, car theft, drug dealing, and assaults with bats, knives, machetes or other weapons, the report says.
"Dear Mr. Ridge, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Rove: Does your "amnesty" include these thousands of illegal aliens who are no more than domestic terror paramilitaries now, operating in your neighbors' backyards and streets and schoolyards in suburban Washington D.C.?"
Many, if not most American hispanics oppose illegal aliens getting bennies or being allowed to stay.
If Jorge would wake up and realize that he would stop hosing the rest of us to pay for illegals.
While there are Americans for whom their hispanic ethnicity far outweighs their loyalty to America, they ain't the majority. Don't blame the latter for the former's actions.
It will be expesnive also, for the 30 years of lax enforcement. What Ridge said seems plausible, offer somewhat of above ground staus not citizenship, and then work on the border problem from there. He didn't say they would become citizens.
You don't worry about throwing all of the invaders out; you do it one at a time. You fine and jail employers of them. You let US citizens who could be doing the jobs they do sue their employers for lost wages.
These are not "illegals", which implies they can be made legal. They are an invasion force which undermines the protections of the US worker, our environment, our culture, and the value of citizenship. But, hey, they're really good for corporate profit.
Edmund Burke gave a speech to the House of Commons in 1774. It was called "Taxation of America". Mr. Burke was against the kings heavy handed treatment of America, not for the colonist's sake, but for England's sake. This is what he said about the colonists:
"Permit me, Sir, to add another circumstance in our colonies, which contributes no mean part towards the growth and effect of this untractable spirit. I mean their education. In no country perhaps in the world is the law so general a study. The profession itself is numerous and powerful; and most provinces it takes the lead......But all who read, and most do read, endeavor to obtain some smattering of that science. I have been told by an eminent bookseller, that in that branch of his business, after tracts of popular devotion, were so many books as those on the law exported to the plantations. The colonies have fallen into the way of printing them for their own use. I hear they have sold nearly as many copies of Blackstone' Commentaries as in England. General Gage marks out this disposition very particularly in a letter on your table. (Gage discouraged measures of oppression of the colonies, "towards a country where every man studies law".). "This study renders men acute, inquisitive, dexterious, prompt in attack, ready in defense, full of resources. In other countries, the people, more simple and of a less mercurial cast, judge of an ill principal in government only by an actual grievance; here they anticipate the evil, and judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principal. They augur misgovernment from a distance, and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze."
If Mr. Bush is part is such a movement, he is no better than Mr. Clinton.
Who said amnesty. Amnesty would imply citizenship. Offer above ground status, then those who do not take it can be deported.
Conservatives, we have the potent GRASSROOTS POLITICAL POWER and the means, and I believe if you put this to a vote to all Freepers (not just lurkers) you would get at least an 80% digust rate with this TRIAL BALLOON and challenge being sent up by the GOP leadership to it's Conservative base.
The knee jerk reaction to trying to solve the problem without careful consideration is quite disappointing.
"Aw, they'll (conservative GOP) will piss and moan all the live long day about this well into the summer of 2004, but at the end of the day, WHERE WILL THEY HAVE TO GO? Nowhere. They'll reelect Bush, even with this proposal, for fear of President Dean or President Hillary. We're sitting good on this one. Gee might even pick up some votes in Arizona and New Mexico."
We can be Damned Sure they are thinking this right now. And for good reason.
Would be nice to prove them wrong, or at least deliver the potent threat to cause them to BACK OFF.
Lead, follow, or GET OUT OF THE WAY.
You are of course correct but nothing encourages racism like injustice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.