Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stop the UN from taking over the Internet

Posted on 12/11/2003 8:43:53 PM PST by webber

Stop the UN from taking over the Internet

In a recent CNSNews.com commentary, Tom DeWeese called the Internet "the only unregulated source of liberty" in a world "already suffocating under the weight of rules and regulations designed to control, tax and consume every outlet of human expression". Well, leave it to the United Nations to hatch a plot to take over the Internet.

According to an article in the Washington Times by John Zarocostas, "Governments spearheaded by China, Brazil, India, Russia and Saudi Arabia are trying to place the Internet under the control of the United Nations or its member governments."

The issue has cropped up in preparatory talks for a world summit on the information society to be held from Dec. 10 to 12 in Geneva, with the stated goal of "advancing the management and worldwide use of the Internet, especially in poorer nations."

Pierre Gagne, executive director of the world summit, has identified control of the Internet as one of two key issues in the talks, adding that control and financial issues "will probably be the last issues to be resolved" at the summit.

The Internet, at present, is loosely managed by a private organization in California named the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which coordinates such matters as Internet servers and domain names. Many third world countries would like to hand over that authority to a U.N. agency, such as the International Telecommunications Union (ITU).

Yoshio Utsumi, secretary-general of the ITU, which will host the December summit, said in an interview that Brazil is "a very strong advocate" of his agency taking over the Internet. China, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Senegal and many other African countries were also "keen" for the United Nations to have a role, he said.

Yeah, we just BET he and his UN buddies are "keen" to take over the Internet. Can you imagine? UN control over all e-mail
UN control over all websites
UN control over all domain names
UN control over all e-commerce

These guys are worse than Dr. Strangelove and Dr. Drakken combined. They really DO want to take over the world!

We need to stop them dead in their tracks, NOW!

ACTION ITEM: So far, The United States, backed by the European Union, Japan and Canada, has been able to turn back third world efforts to place the Internet under the control of the United Nations or its member governments. But we haven*t stopped them -- just slowed them down.

In fact, as of today, the participating nations have agreed "to ask U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to set up a working group on Internet governance *in an open and inclusive process that ensures a mechanism for the full participation of governments, the private sector and civil society... to investigate and make proposals for action, as appropriate, by 2005."

This means these UN world-government types are going to pressure everyone for over a year to "take the Internet away" from privately-run ICANN, and put it under control of the UN. And who has the power to stop them? Right now, our one big hope is President Bush.

So, we*ve set up a quick and easy way for you to have your voice heard LOUD and CLEAR on this issue!

NOTE: As always, we*ve set up a way for you to send an e-mail to President Bush for FREE.

"Cut" and "copy" the "letter to the president" below, and then click on the link that's below the letter and paste the letter to the president into your email and then send it off to the President.


(President Bush's email address: president@whitehouse.gov)

Dear President Bush,

I urge you in the strongest possible terms to instruct any and all U.S. representatives to the United Nations to "hold the line" against any attempts by the UN to take over control of the Internet.

The Internet is the only unregulated source of liberty in a world already suffocating under the weight of rules and regulations designed to control, tax and consume every outlet of human expression.

We must NOT allow it to come under the control of forces hostile to the very idea of individual liberty, such as China, Brazil, India, Russia and Saudi Arabia.

The greatest threat to personal privacy over the Internet today is posed by governments that gather information to profile users, snoop into bank accounts, and track our movements.

Should we now put an unaccountable, faceless international bureaucracy in control to compound the situation?

Mr. President, please do NOT allow any governments or groups to place the Internet under the control of the United Nations or its member governments. Thank you.

Sincerely,

(Your Name and Address)


CLICK HERE

As DeWeese noted, "the greatest threat to personal privacy over the Internet today is posed by governments that gather information to profile users, snoop into bank accounts, and track our movements. Should we now put an unaccountable, faceless international bureaucracy in control to compound the situation?"

Be sure to forward this Alert to everyone you know that wants to keep the UN*s grubby little hands OFF of the *net. If every one reading this bombards the White House with e-mail letters and demonstrates an outpouring of grassroots support for keeping the Internet UN-free, we can put a STOP to efforts of these international faceless bureaucrats!

We*ll need a concerted demonstration of solidarity to keep President Bush "on task" with everything else going on.

Thank you!

Newsmax.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2003 8:43:55 PM PST by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: webber
The solution is simple. Get them distracted by some other topic that they can spend millions of Euros and years of time working on....perhaps they can work on which is best, wiping up, or down one's backside.

That should keep them busy for years!

2 posted on 12/11/2003 8:48:13 PM PST by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
The UN will take its time, it will lobby for years about the problems with the digital divide and fairness until countries start agreeing with them.
3 posted on 12/11/2003 8:52:05 PM PST by GeronL (Is your Tagline weak, limp and ineffective? Has it hurt your relationship? Try TiAGra today!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
This will never happen.
Bill Gates won't let it.
He's not, along with the other internet tycoons,
are NOT going to allow anything to disrupt their business.
4 posted on 12/11/2003 8:57:50 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Money talks, the UN walks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Not a one of those countries in support of putting the net under UN jurisdiction has a solid human rights record. Hardly surprising then...
5 posted on 12/11/2003 9:16:35 PM PST by Ex-Dem ([N]o [B]alance in [C]overage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
They can have it when they pry my mouse out of my cold, dead hand.
6 posted on 12/11/2003 9:25:09 PM PST by anonymous_user (If the U.N. is the answer, it must be a really stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
And who has the power to stop them?

ICANN (with the root nameservers), the backbones and the ISPs call the shots. Others can try to "take control", and get absolutely nowhere fast.

The truth is that the internet was developed as a strategic U.S. asset, and it remains just that. Everyone else is welcome to go along for the ride, but if they get too grabby, they will be cut off.

This is why countries like China, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, et al, or tin-pot dictatorships like the UN cannot take over the Internet. They simply lack the ability, and it can't even be given away to them, simply because it is impractical, if for no other reason.

7 posted on 12/12/2003 1:03:10 AM PST by Imal (The best soldiers are zealots, the best officers patriots, the best generals philosophers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
.
8 posted on 12/12/2003 2:43:19 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (A nation of sheep will eventually beget a government of wolves !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
The real motive is for scumbag Kofi Annan and his Muslim crew and 3rd world crew to have a source of funding for the UN and UN armed forces. Via taxing e-commerce and other internet transactions.

A dream come true for those who hate the USA and Israel.
9 posted on 12/12/2003 2:46:45 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
The "Internet" per se is pretty much whoever owns the bandwidth and the servers which comprise it. To talk of the UN "taking it over" is ludicrous on its face.
10 posted on 12/12/2003 2:58:43 AM PST by Johnny_Cipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Don't computers cause global warming?
11 posted on 12/12/2003 3:02:57 AM PST by cp124 (The Great Wall Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
The Internet is the only unregulated source of liberty in a world already suffocating under the weight of rules and regulations designed to control, tax and consume every outlet of human expression.

Hardly fair to use DeWeese's quote without an attribution.

12 posted on 12/12/2003 3:09:58 AM PST by Glenn (What were you thinking, Al?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
From the article:

As DeWeese noted, "the greatest threat to personal privacy over the Internet today is posed by governments that gather information to profile users, snoop into bank accounts, and track our movements. Should we now put an unaccountable, faceless international bureaucracy in control to compound the situation?"

13 posted on 12/12/2003 3:21:47 AM PST by metesky (Kids, don't let this happen to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: webber
Put off until 2005.
internet control
14 posted on 12/12/2003 3:29:39 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
The irony here is that the Internet is a free Global entity – so what is it the global loyalists really want? Answer: they want the world under one ruler that of the United Nations. A rogue organization made up of corrupt leaders of large and small nations who contribute little to peace and humanity, the very reason the United Nations was started in the first place.
15 posted on 12/12/2003 5:33:39 AM PST by yoe (Mrs. Clinton's heart is rumored to be as big as a Caraway Seed, but I think that is an exaggeration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cp124
Don't computers cause global warming?

Hot air coming out of the UN is the greatest single cause of global warming.

16 posted on 12/12/2003 11:19:25 AM PST by highlander_UW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: webber
Calling the creator of the Internet--owl gore! Where are you turkey! Plug the holes, Gore!
17 posted on 12/12/2003 12:57:10 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Do you think the reeducation camps for FReepers will be different from the others?
18 posted on 12/12/2003 2:58:16 PM PST by Barnacle (Navigating the treacherous waters of a liberal culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle
Yes I do think our reeducation camps will be different from the others.
They know we won't wither under personal onslaught, so they will go after our loved ones instead. ~/no sarcasm
19 posted on 12/12/2003 11:42:54 PM PST by Indie (Have you bought more ammo today??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
9 good point- "The real motive is for scumbag Kofi Annan and his Muslim crew and 3rd world crew to have a source of funding for the UN and UN armed forces. Via taxing e-commerce and other internet transactions. "
20 posted on 12/14/2003 8:46:58 PM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson