Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[PSU USG] Senator resigns due to photos [Penn State College Republicans]
The Digital Collegian [Penn State student newspaper] ^ | December 11, 2003 | Natalie Hrubos

Posted on 12/11/2003 8:21:57 PM PST by StopGlobalWhining

The fallout from controversial Halloween photos posted on the College Republican chair's personal Web site has led one student to announce her withdrawal from the university.

Undergraduate Student Government (USG) Pollock/Nittany Sen. Vicky Cangelosi announced her resignation and intention to withdraw at Tuesday's Senate meeting.

She said she no longer feels safe at the university and that she feels Penn State President Graham Spanier put her in danger by including a link to The fallout from controversial Halloween photos posted on the College Republican chair's personal Web site has led one student to announce her withdrawal from the university.

Undergraduate Student Government (USG) Pollock/Nittany Sen. Vicky Cangelosi announced her resignation and intention to withdraw at Tuesday's Senate meeting.

She said she no longer feels safe at the university and that she feels Penn State President Graham Spanier put her in danger by including a link to Penn State's online student directory in his written public statement about the pictures. As a result, she removed her address from the directory and later decided to withdraw from the university.

Cangelosi was not named in Spanier's statement, which was distributed over the Penn State Newswire. Newswire e-mail announcements always include the directory link at the end.

Cangelosi is one of five USG members who attended former Town Sen. Brian Battaglia's controversial Halloween party.

"Quite honestly, I'm very scared of the situation and how it has escalated," she said.

Cangelosi said she is afraid to sleep in her apartment and has not been attending classes.

The USG Senate voted Tuesday to form a committee of senators to investigate the character of USG members who attended the party. The committee could call for the impeachment of the three senators involved: Cangelosi, East Halls Sen. Matt Ritsko, and South Halls Sen. Andy Banducci.

In a statement that she made about 1:30 yesterday morning, Cangelosi said her parents are afraid for her safety, and they contacted Spanier, who did not respond. They eventually spoke with Art Carter, assistant vice president for student affairs, Cangelosi said.

She said Carter told her parents that Cangelosi was "imagining things."

Carter is out of town until tomorrow and could not be reached for comment.

Matt Midles, who was appointed temporary parliamentarian for the meeting, told Cangelosi that as a gay student, he feels endangered every day.

"I'm glad that you've been given an insight to what the students who have been targeted feel every day," Midles said. "You're being treated the same way that I've been treated my whole life."

Cangelosi told senators that she did not arrive at the Halloween party until after 11 p.m. and was dressed in a pirate costume.

One of the photographs found on Battaglia's Web site (http://botag.net) pictured former USG member Jason Covener dressed as USG Vice President and former Black Caucus Vice President Takkeem Morgan. Covener's face was painted black, and he was wearing a bicycle chain around his neck.

Cangelosi said no one was wearing an "offensive" costume while she was there and that Covener must have already wiped off the blackface by the time she arrived.

Other photographers portrayed an "oversodomized frat pledge," a "sorostitute" and an unidentified white man wearing blue bed sheets with a caption referring to the Ku Klux Klan.

Cangelosi said there is no truth in the statement that Battaglia's Halloween party was racist in theme.

"I condemn all racist actions and hate speech," Cangelosi said. "I very seriously resent any notion that I am a racist."

At Tuesday's meeting, Banducci, who also attended the Halloween party, addressed his fellow senators about the investigation against him and Ritsko.

"I realize the situation that everyone is in at this table," Banducci said. "I caution you to make a judgment, when you are looking at this, based on the people you know. Judge us fairly."

USG governmental relations director Frank Camarota also addressed the Senate at Tuesday's meeting, where he apologized for his delayed reaction.

"Had I known then what I know now of the recourse of those pictures, I would have taken a stronger stance against them," Camarota told senators.

Late Tuesday night, Julia Graham, USG Supreme Court clerk, issued a statement in relation to her attendance at the party, apologizing to those who were offended by the pictures.

"As much as I regret not taking some sort of action at the party, the simple fact is that it is in the past," Graham said. "So instead of belaboring the points of these past events, I would rather focus upon the future, over which we have control."

Graham indicated that this issue would not affect her duties as court clerk.Penn State's online student directory in his written public statement about the pictures. As a result, she removed her address from the directory and later decided to withdraw from the university.

Cangelosi was not named in Spanier's statement, which was distributed over the Penn State Newswire. Newswire e-mail announcements always include the directory link at the end.

Cangelosi is one of five USG members who attended former Town Sen. Brian Battaglia's controversial Halloween party.

"Quite honestly, I'm very scared of the situation and how it has escalated," she said.

Cangelosi said she is afraid to sleep in her apartment and has not been attending classes.

The USG Senate voted Tuesday to form a committee of senators to investigate the character of USG members who attended the party. The committee could call for the impeachment of the three senators involved: Cangelosi, East Halls Sen. Matt Ritsko, and South Halls Sen. Andy Banducci.

In a statement that she made about 1:30 yesterday morning, Cangelosi said her parents are afraid for her safety, and they contacted Spanier, who did not respond. They eventually spoke with Art Carter, assistant vice president for student affairs, Cangelosi said.

She said Carter told her parents that Cangelosi was "imagining things."

Carter is out of town until tomorrow and could not be reached for comment.

Matt Midles, who was appointed temporary parliamentarian for the meeting, told Cangelosi that as a gay student, he feels endangered every day.

"I'm glad that you've been given an insight to what the students who have been targeted feel every day," Midles said. "You're being treated the same way that I've been treated my whole life."

Cangelosi told senators that she did not arrive at the Halloween party until after 11 p.m. and was dressed in a pirate costume.

One of the photographs found on Battaglia's Web site (http://botag.net) pictured former USG member Jason Covener dressed as USG Vice President and former Black Caucus Vice President Takkeem Morgan. Covener's face was painted black, and he was wearing a bicycle chain around his neck.

Cangelosi said no one was wearing an "offensive" costume while she was there and that Covener must have already wiped off the blackface by the time she arrived.

Other photographers portrayed an "oversodomized frat pledge," a "sorostitute" and an unidentified white man wearing blue bed sheets with a caption referring to the Ku Klux Klan.

Cangelosi said there is no truth in the statement that Battaglia's Halloween party was racist in theme.

"I condemn all racist actions and hate speech," Cangelosi said. "I very seriously resent any notion that I am a racist."

At Tuesday's meeting, Banducci, who also attended the Halloween party, addressed his fellow senators about the investigation against him and Ritsko.

"I realize the situation that everyone is in at this table," Banducci said. "I caution you to make a judgment, when you are looking at this, based on the people you know. Judge us fairly."

USG governmental relations director Frank Camarota also addressed the Senate at Tuesday's meeting, where he apologized for his delayed reaction.

"Had I known then what I know now of the recourse of those pictures, I would have taken a stronger stance against them," Camarota told senators.

Late Tuesday night, Julia Graham, USG Supreme Court clerk, issued a statement in relation to her attendance at the party, apologizing to those who were offended by the pictures.

"As much as I regret not taking some sort of action at the party, the simple fact is that it is in the past," Graham said. "So instead of belaboring the points of these past events, I would rather focus upon the future, over which we have control."

Graham indicated that this issue would not affect her duties as court clerk.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: academia; bikethief; character; leftwinghate; oversodomized; spanier; takkeem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: No More Gore Anymore
Look, you and I can agree it's a disgrace for USG to retain a student, of any race, who's been convicted of a crime while in office.

But you have to realize, racially inflammatory behavior on a college campus, is simply not going to be defended in today's era by any university administration or student government.

I know what a weasel Spanier is, but it's any college president's job to proactively put the lid on racially inflammatory events as quickly as possible before any escalation occurs. From the administration's perspective, a stolen bicycle simply isn't on the same plane.

But this episode should help put more public focus on Takeem's low character, and efforts to investigate and possibly remove him should be redoubled. But race should not be part of that discussion.

If Takeem has an ounce of decency, believe me this attention on him is quite harsh, and his future is being impacted. All of PSU now knows him as a petty thief, and probably a race hustler.

What I'm suggesting to you is that you can win the culture war fighting from the higher ground. I hope at the least to have given you food for thought. If not we can agree to disagree. Good luck.
61 posted on 12/14/2003 9:45:28 AM PST by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
Let's be clear what we are agreeing to disagree with.

I say that racism of any type on campus is wrong. You seem to believe that campus racism against whites is OK, and that special allowances need to be made for blacks and racist groups - so long as they are black groups.

You seem to take as given that putting black face on is some type of "racism". Tell me - what was derogitory about it? What is the excitement about? The target of the lampoon is black - and chooses to make that a critical element of his political self definition. What "Racist" action occurred? The reason I am belaboring this point is because for some reason we all seem to be buying into this "poor judgement and socially unnacceptable behaviour = racism" It is not. It may not be PC - but it is not racism. What it is is a Free Speach issue - I do not have to agree with the speech, but he does have the right to make it.

Racism is among other things getting special treatment or position based solely on a person's race. That is what Takeem wants, what Takeem has been the recipient of, and that is what the University appears to be defending. That is the racist element in this event.

Takeem is a leadership member of the Black Caucus. He is the one who brought race into this - no one else. This was his choice - to join and lead a racist organization. He is not some innocent bystander who happens to have dark skin. He has been abbetted by a University that allows racist (or race based) organizations to exist.

The University practices a double standard based on race - you are evidently OK with that. I am not.

You state "Racially inflammatory behavior on a college campus is simply not going to be defended in today's era by any University administration or student government." Lets break it down:

1. Keeping a convicted thief in student government based on his race IS racially inflamatory behaviour. University defending it.

2. "Not going to be defended" by the administration? They are not defending the exerciser of free speach here - they are vilifying him. Lets make sure we state exactly what is going on - the concept of defending his freedom of speach never entered the minds of the administration - the knee jerk reaction is to label the guy a racist, and have the University President get involved? That is not defending any rights other than the rights of the student government to have racial bias built into their system, and making sure the message gets out load and clear what wil lhappen to anyone who questions it. They are defending keeping Takeem, but not the right of someone to exercise Free Speech - PC or not - to draw attention to it.

3. The adminsitration routinely SUPPORTS racially inflammatory behaviour - as long as it is pro black. The existence of a Black Caucus is BY DEFINITION racist - if not please tell me how a group formed only along the base of race is not racist.

What we agree on:

Takeem should not be in student government - but is.
This episode has exposed him for what he is.

What we disagree on -

1. That it should come to this for Takeem's record to come to light. I think the administration could easily have weighed in on a non-racial issue very easily and much earlier - race not involved. I do not think it is OK for them to allow a double standard to exist in their student government. You think racism in student government is OK, or should only be questioned in non-controntational ways that are easy to sweep under the rug.

I think racism of any type on campus is wrong.
You think racism against whites, or for blacks, on campus is OK, and should be supported by the administration.

I am standing on the higher ground.

You are standing on the ground of white guilt and acceptance of institutionalized racism.
62 posted on 12/14/2003 12:24:10 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: No More Gore Anymore
You seem to believe that campus racism against whites is OK,

You're ridiculous. You know you're losing a debate when you start using the "you seem" method of debate, ascribing motives and actions to people without proof, and frame every single fact-set in the terms of victimhood, again straight out of the Victimology handbook. You're race hustling with the best of them.

The one time you actually use my real words, you proceed to argue an assertion of fact without substantiation.

You haven't established either that (1) the University administration is defending Takeem's retention in office, or that (2) they're doing so because of race.

If you want to build a case, take small steps and establish your foundation.

I'm not wasting any more time on this. Let's agree to disagree on everything under the sun. You may now proceed to Step 2 in the Victimology Handbook, ad hominem.

63 posted on 12/14/2003 4:36:58 PM PST by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
I have stated clearly what I believe. Equal rights and equal treatment under the law. You want to "agree to disagree". Fine with me.

What exactly do you stand for?

I do agree - I have no evidence that the University is defending Takeem. I also see that the university president felt he had to address a joke in bad taste in writing, but as far as I know did not directly address the presence of the thief in student council. I take this as evidence of his priorities, supported by the reaminder of the race based initiatives and systems on campus.

By the way - I was trying to be kind with the "you seem" quote. Evidently you are uncomfortable with your position, and now you want to turn this into a name calling contest - "You're ridiculous" - "go check your facts" - "race hustling with the best of them" - setting my arguments in the format of "the Victimology handbook" etc.

Your post appears (seems)as if you are angry - could this be because someone has not taken the position that the white man is automatically wrong in a case such as this? Or not accepting that it is a heinous crime to call attention to the poor performance of a black man? Or is it my challenging the assumption that only whites can be racist? Or that freedom of speech is not contingent on some PC filter approved by the ultra sensitivity of the leaders of a race based special interest group?

Is it racist to question a black man? Is it racist to question an institution that formally and publicly treats people differently based on race? Is that not the definition of racism?

Does every joke in bad taste need a written response from the President of the university?

I do grant after some research that Penn State has recently been sort of a racial hot bed - though of course none of the "hate crimes" reported have ever been substantiated even after review by the FBI. Given the credibility of the Black Caucus leadership, and the FBI, I will wait for real evidence.

Here are a few very loosely researched facts for you - I can't investigate every school and every program (I will not chase facts for you) - and I will grant that my sourcing is weak. However - they also are completely consistent and logical given the state of current higher education.

Easy one - the fact that the Black Caucus exists and is recognized by the school is racist. By definition. No research required. Do you have trouble understanding that? Why do you think they exist?

"At Penn State University, black students who manage a C average get cash rewards of $550. Blacks with a B average or better get $1,100. Whites of course, get no such handouts." "American Renaissance", 1991.

"The state of Pennsylvania recently set up what it calls the Pennsylvania Graduate Opportunities Tuition Waiver Program. Thirty of the state's 133 universities have agreed to offer complete, graduate-studies scholarships to blacks. Sixteen have made the offer to any qualified black, in any field of study he chooses. Race, not financial need, makes students eligible.The state is raising $15 million to pay for the program," American Renaissance, 1991.

In The Closing of the American Mind, Allan Bloom wrote of the "shadow of university life" in which blacks operate at Cornell University: (Agreed - not PSU - but to me it seems he is describing the same culture).

". . . permanent quotas in admissions, preference in financial assistance, racially motivated hiring of faculty, difficulty in giving blacks failing marks, and an organized system of grievance and feeling aggrieved. And everywhere hypocrisy, contempt-producing lies about what is going on and how the whole scheme is working?"

I think the black face was a joke in bad taste, and certainly don't think it was a good idea. It has already been apologized for. And that is all it was - a joke in bad taste.

As for victimhood and victimology, I will leave that to the expert members of the Black Caucus.

And I continue to find racism wrong in any forum. I do not think that racial hyper sensitivity on college campuses is doing anyone any good. If that is "race hustling" you must be using a different dictionary than I.
64 posted on 12/14/2003 9:18:48 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: No More Gore Anymore
Equal rights and equal treatment under the law.

I agree with that. But this isn't a legal case is it? It's just some stupid kids dressed up in blackface and KKK sheets getting spanked for racially inflammatory behaviour, spanked by a student government and a university administration, historically fickle and subjective bodies as everyone with an ounce of sense or prudence knows.

You're taking longer and longer to say less and less. You're not persuading me by being more and more indirect and avoiding the provable facts.

but as far as I know did not directly address the presence of the thief in student council. I take this as evidence of his priorities, supported by the reaminder of the race based initiatives and systems on campus.

Here you are emotionally stacking up reasons to feel victimized, as though Spanier and the university are in a conspiracy specifically against you in particular or whites in general. Race-based initiatives are unrelated to this case. Takeem's bicycle theft is unrelated to this case. Stringing together isolated perceived grievances into a victimization conspiracy is what race hustlers do. Attack one grievance on its merits, then move on to the next, on the merits. If you find a real conspiracy, then prove it. Otherwise you're just Jesse Jackson.

Read your replies to me and imagine them as Letters-to-the-Editor of the Collegian or the CDT. Would you be comfortable making these arguments to a wider public, for your friends, family, teachers, etc. to read them? Would they be proud and agree or would they sit you down for a serious talk? Think.

Again, if you think it inappropriate for Takeem to hold office in USG, then act on it on the merits, not because his skin is dark. You may win, or you may fail, and then you will have learned that justice is not a science but a work in progress.

65 posted on 12/14/2003 10:08:00 PM PST by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: witnesstothefall
Make the world safe for idiots in sheets...

Isn't that exactly what the US Senate has done for the laughingly called "Honorable" Senator Robert Byrd (D,WV)?

Last year, Chris Matthews, who had worked as an aide to former House Speaker Tip O'Neill, disclosed that O'Neill used to refer to Byrd as "Sheets".

66 posted on 12/15/2003 7:43:38 PM PST by StopGlobalWhining (Sticks and stones may hurt my bones, but names will never hurt me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: No More Gore Anymore
"At Penn State University, black students who manage a C average get cash rewards of $550. Blacks with a B average or better get $1,100. Whites of course, get no such handouts." "American Renaissance", 1991.

I wonder how many PSU students are aware of this program? I have mentioned it to several students recently and they were skeptical. Unless it has been discontinued during the past decade, this was definitely the case in the early 1990's.

I believe that there has been a racial backlash at Penn State in recent years, and that many students have come straight out of high school into PSU without a prejudiced bone in their body, only to leave here 4 years later with entirely different attitudes.

67 posted on 12/15/2003 8:01:31 PM PST by StopGlobalWhining (Sticks and stones may hurt my bones, but names will never hurt me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson