Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's Palace May Be U.S. Embassy Site
Associated Press ^ | 12/11/03 | JIM KRANE

Posted on 12/11/2003 1:10:33 PM PST by TexKat

BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. bombs never hit Saddam Hussein's grandiose presidential palace in Baghdad, making its ample meeting rooms and vast conference tables an ideal headquarters for U.S.-led occupation authorities after the war.

Now the building — the physical seat and biggest symbol of Saddam's 23-year dictatorship — is the likely site for the next U.S. Embassy in Iraq, U.S. officials in Washington and Iraq said this week.

A State Department official in Washington, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the palace is among several locations under consideration for the embassy, where the U.S. government's official representative will be based after power is handed over to an Iraqi government by July 1.

Critics say the move will show the world that the U.S. intends to remain the true power in Iraq.

Currently the building, sealed inside a U.S.-occupied neighborhood that sprawls alongside the Tigris River in central Baghdad, holds the headquarters of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S.-led entity that oversees Iraq.

If the transition goes as planned, the CPA will be dissolved and U.S. affairs will be directed from the same building, which will become the embassy, a coalition official said on condition of anonymity.

"Although the CPA will cease to exist on July 1, there will still be much work to accomplish and the U.S. will still have many interests to pursue here," the official wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press. "Therefore, the logical replacement for CPA is an American Embassy and we expect that CPA, or at least a part of it, will evolve into the embassy."

However, no final decision designating the palace has been made, the official said, adding that the site search was still in the early stages.

After U.S. military columns rolled into Baghdad, troops set up their cots in the palace's opulent ballroom, with grubby troops washing themselves in its marble-walled bathrooms with gold-plated fixtures.

Until recently, the roof of the four-story, 600-foot-long building was topped with four 30-foot-tall busts of Saddam wearing a Mogul helmet. The U.S.-led occupation administration ordered the bronze sculptures removed last week.

A Pentagon official in Baghdad said an official survey of possible embassy sites, including the palace, will be conducted in Baghdad on Friday. Others here have said the palace is the most likely site because it's already in use, and is big and secure.

If the building does become the U.S. Embassy, analysts say its negative symbolism as the previous seat of Iraq's dictatorship will be reinforced when U.S. representatives move in. The choice could suggest to Iraqis that the United States will remain the true power in Iraq, some said.

"If we want to symbolize American plans to dominate Iraq after the transition to self-government, we could not choose a better site," said Richard K. Betts, director of the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University in New York. "If we want a credible signal that we'll fade into the background after liberating the country, the choice could hardly be worse."

If things were going well for the Americans in Iraq — and for the Iraqis themselves — such symbols might not matter.

"Given that things are tense, security is still a problem and promised money hasn't arrived, this will be further evidence that we are up to no good," said Rachel Bronson, director of the Middle East Studies program at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.

The State Department official said the palace may be "the real estate" that can best house the embassy — at least until a new compound can be built.

U.S. airstrikes destroyed or damaged many other buildings in the surrounding presidential compound, which lies in the security area known as the "Green Zone." But the palace, on a favorite jogging route for U.S. government workers in Iraq, sits unscathed.

The previous U.S. Embassy, in east Baghdad's al-Mesbah section, was vacated in 1990 when the United States broke diplomatic relations with Iraq after its invasion of Kuwait. Polish diplomats took over that building, which is now the Polish Embassy.

After the 1991 Gulf War and until the U.S. invasion in April, U.S. affairs were handled at the Polish Embassy.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fate; grandiose; iraq; palace; presidential; rebuildingiraq; saddam; usembassy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
This would be a fate worse than death for Saddam. He will not be able to rest in his grave.
1 posted on 12/11/2003 1:10:34 PM PST by TexKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MEG33; Ragtime Cowgirl; windchime; Dog; Grampa Dave; radu
Ping
2 posted on 12/11/2003 1:11:51 PM PST by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Ohhhhh, I like it.
3 posted on 12/11/2003 1:14:10 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Saddam's Palace May Be U.S. Embassy Site

It would make a great Kurd/Shiite paintball gamepark?

4 posted on 12/11/2003 1:14:24 PM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
ROTFL! Excellent site!
5 posted on 12/11/2003 1:18:31 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
picture ?
6 posted on 12/11/2003 1:21:19 PM PST by traumer (Even paranoids have enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Critics say the move will show the world that the U.S. intends to remain the true power in Iraq.

Waaaaaah...

7 posted on 12/11/2003 2:27:35 PM PST by demlosers (Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traumer
picture ?


8 posted on 12/11/2003 2:35:33 PM PST by demlosers (Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
I was actually thinking that it would be a great property for some big plush hotel chain to develop as a resort. Once the peace does settle in, a lot of the large hospitality chains are eventually going to move in and develop Baghdad as a destination.

Michael

9 posted on 12/11/2003 2:38:37 PM PST by Wright is right! (Never get excited about ANYTHING by the way it looks from behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
Furthering my idea, the powers that be ought to sell if for 50 gazillion bucks to Radisson or Meridien and use the money for rebuilding the country. Earmark the bucks for one specific purpose, like electricity.

Michael

10 posted on 12/11/2003 2:41:05 PM PST by Wright is right! (Never get excited about ANYTHING by the way it looks from behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Looks like a perfect place for an embassy to me!
11 posted on 12/11/2003 2:59:38 PM PST by buffyt (Can you say President Hillary? Me Neither!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: TexKat
Richard K. Betts, director of the Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University in New York (says) "If we want a credible signal that we'll fade into the background after liberating the country, the choice could hardly be worse."

Want to bet this is some leftwing front group embedded into academia. In order to assauge feelings of U.S. dominance, a gallows could be erected at the front gate from which to let Saddam swing.

13 posted on 12/11/2003 3:32:15 PM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexKat; MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; ...
Thanks, Kat. (^:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

U.S. bombs never hit Saddam Hussein's grandiose presidential palace in Baghdad, making its ample meeting rooms and vast conference tables an ideal headquarters for U.S.-led occupation authorities after the war.

Now the building — the physical seat and biggest symbol of Saddam's 23-year dictatorship — is the likely site for the next U.S. Embassy in Iraq, U.S. officials in Washington and Iraq said this week.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14 posted on 12/11/2003 5:01:13 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl ( "Our military is full of the finest people on the face of the earth." ~ Pres. Bush, Baghdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Considering the fact that we are GIVING them $18 billion dollars to help them rebuild, and considering we picked up the tab for most (if not all) of the liberation, they should not resent in the least our having a very nice embassy.
15 posted on 12/11/2003 5:21:36 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Great picture! :)
16 posted on 12/11/2003 5:37:44 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; F14 Pilot
Great picture at 14.
17 posted on 12/11/2003 5:57:01 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexKat
That's going to be one hell of a big embassy.
18 posted on 12/11/2003 6:56:54 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
19 posted on 12/11/2003 8:31:32 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexKat; Ragtime Cowgirl
Seems like it would be the perfect site since the secured 'green' zone is already set up and would be advantageous during the transition in use of the building.
20 posted on 12/11/2003 11:40:25 PM PST by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson