[FairOpinion]

Apparently you both need logic lessons.

In the elecion there is a definite A or B choice, not infinite variations in-between.

Since you can't refute that argument, because it's irrefutable, by definition, that if you don't get A, you get B, you come up with what you think is a clever "analogy", which is totally inappropriate, because there you have infinite choices between the two extreme points.

Which part of "If Bush doesn't get elected, the Dem candidate will" don't you understand?

[Hoverbug]

Boy, you really are full of crap.

Hb

[Fledermaus]

Uh oh. I wouldn't argue logic with SAJ. You'll lose everytime. I should know, he's bopped me more than once! lol

[nopardons]

They don't care!

Neither do any of these PURISTS care that historically speaking, their argument doesn't hold water, either. Look at that post about the governement/president shredding the Constitution having started 25 years ago, or in 1978 , forinstance. My GOD, 1978 ?

[SAJ]

Your just failed Logic 101.

There is ALWAYS option C -- none of the above. Whether or not that this option is palatable to you, it is an option...therefore, let's please in future be just a trifle more cautious about declaiming about logic, ok?

[At _War_With_Liberals]

Agree with your posts 100%. Trying to figure out what the hell is wrong with many other FReepers today.

You are being attacked for well thought out positions and ideas. I don't get it.