Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ranchers Sued by Civil Rights Group
Associated Press ^ | Dec 10, 2003 | Arthur H. Rotstein

Posted on 12/10/2003 8:04:34 PM PST by AnimalLover

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-249 next last
To: HiJinx
The location of the property is not something to be inferred, though. Anyone can go look at mapquest.com and see that the property in question is three miles from the border, and that a whole town is between the monastery and the border.
181 posted on 12/11/2003 6:31:11 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
Oops. Forgot something. Also the standing of the plaintiffs and whom they are advocating for must be called into question. Again, I recommend the defendant attain compitent legal council.
182 posted on 12/11/2003 6:32:33 AM PST by PRO 1 (POX on posters who's political bent causes them to refuse to be confused by the FACTS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
I'm with ya...call 'em what they are not "immigrants" "migrants" or, and I LOVE this one..."undocumented immigrants"
183 posted on 12/11/2003 6:36:40 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (1/27th Infantry...Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rudy45
Who owns the 22,000 acre ranch?

I can tell you that the government owns it. If they don't pay protection money (property taxes) it will be taken in a heartbeat.

That protection money of course does not allow for protecting his property but protecting ILLEGALS !!


184 posted on 12/11/2003 6:39:59 AM PST by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: usadave

Ah, shucks about those pesky laws and Constitutional rights, eh?

185 posted on 12/11/2003 6:40:32 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: PRO 1
The following article wasn't dated, but it's from earlier this year:

Pro-Immigrant Group Ups Border Efforts
By ANABELLE GARAY
Associated Press Writer

PHOENIX - Immigrants crossing the Mexican border into America are often pursued by authorities and chased by civilians. Now an immigrant advocacy group is hunting for them, too.

Volunteers for the pro-immigrant Border Action Network are searching for any undocumented migrants who have been harassed by armed civilian groups patrolling the border.

The network said Tuesday that the vigilante groups operate outside the law and violate the rights of immigrants. They hope to pressure authorities to intervene.

Once alleged victims come forward, attorneys plan to sue the people or groups accused of assaulting, robbing, intimidating or illegally detaining border-crossers.

"The purpose of the suit is to get at their pocketbook," said Jesus Romo, a civil rights attorney in Tucson. "Our purpose is to bankrupt these individuals so that they stop their actions."

No lawsuits have been filed thus far.

The self-appointed border patrol groups deny they are breaking the law, and said they pass along to authorities information that volunteers collect about illegal border-crossers.

The groups began appearing in Arizona in response to widespread complaints from border-area residents who said they were being overrun by large numbers of illegal immigrants.

Border Action Network volunteers are stretching their search for alleged victims along the entire U.S.-Mexican border and as far south as the Mexican state of Chiapas.

The network plans also to continue using radio spots and newspaper ads to find plaintiffs, particularly focusing in areas where migrants originate.

Glenn Spencer, president of American Border Patrol, an organization based in Sierra Vista that monitors illegal border-crossers, said his group operates lawfully and does not interfere with migrants.

Still, he said he's concerned about groups that plan to file lawsuits. "Things are getting a little hairy," he said. "They're heightening feelings on both sides of the border. They are trying to rabble-rouse."

Another group that has patrolled the Arizona-Mexico border was sued in Texas over two incidents of alleged abuse against detained migrants.

A lawsuit filed in May accuses Ranch Rescue and others of assaulting, falsely imprisoning and robbing six people during two incidents in March in rural south Texas.

Miguel Escobar, Mexican consul in Douglas, said many alleged victims have either been deported or moved away. Others have been too fearful to testify.

http://extensionenespanol.net/articles.cfm?articleid=113

186 posted on 12/11/2003 6:48:57 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
Border Action Network ??

Isn't this Tom Ridge's new friends?

187 posted on 12/11/2003 6:54:40 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover

Shooting and shoveling, or even using a backhoe to cover up mass murder, doesn't hurt anyone, eh?

Follow the law is what I would want everyone to do. There are lawful ways to effect citizen's arrests, and there are lawful ways to enter other people's property, just as there are lawful ways to enter the country.

188 posted on 12/11/2003 6:57:32 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
We need to start lawsuits against these organizations to bankrupt them - fight fire with fire. Also does anybody know how we can contribute to help this ranch family with their legal costs? Thanks
189 posted on 12/11/2003 7:39:15 AM PST by sasafras (sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iconoclast2
I am not surprised. Thanks.
190 posted on 12/11/2003 7:51:23 AM PST by scan58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: calawah98
ANNOUNCER: Tonight, in "Broken Borders," Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge says millions of illegal aliens in this country should be given legal status. We'll be joined by two congressmen to discuss this critically important issue.

DOBBS: In "Broken Borders" tonight, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge is calling for the legalization of millions of illegal aliens living in this country.

Speaking at a Dade County town hall meeting near Miami yesterday, Ridge said -- and we quote -- "The bottom line is, as a country, we have to come to grips with the presence of eight to 12 million illegals, afford them some kind of legal status, some way, but also, as a country, decide what our immigration policy is and then enforce it."

Joining me now, two members of Congress who have outspoken views on the issue of immigration reform, Congressman Tom Tancredo of Colorado. He chairs the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, joining us tonight from Denver.

Good to have you with us, Congressman.

(CROSSTALK)

DOBBS: Congressman Howard Berman of California, a member of the International Relations Committee. In September, he co-authored a bill giving illegal aliens permanent residency, joining us tonight from Los Angeles.

Congressman, good to have you with us.

This statement by Tom Ridge coming something of a bolt from the blue, Congressman Tancredo. What's your reaction?

REP. TOM TANCREDO (R), COLORADO: Secretary Ridge is way, way, way out of line here.

First of all, the creation of immigration policy or changing immigration policy is the responsibility of the Congress, and the Congress alone. His responsibility is to enforce it. If he doesn't like the policy, if he thinks he can't enforce it because he doesn't have the resources, he has two choices.

He comes to the Congress and says, I need the resources to enforce the law, or, I choose not to enforce the law and I'm going to resign. His is not to make a determination as to which laws should be enforced and which should not. We have an immigration policy. It's now certainly imperfect in many ways, but the secretary should enforce the law or resign.

DOBBS: Congressman Berman, let me ask you, your reaction?

REP. HOWARD BERMAN (D), CALIFORNIA: Tom Ridge is a former congressman. He knows full well that the Congress legislates our immigration policy.

What he was showing was leadership in recognizing the reality of the situation. We have a law. We haven't been able to enforce it. We've invested billions of dollars, massive expansion of Border Patrol, tremendous amount of new technologies, and we still haven't been able to enforce that border. What he's trying to do is come to grips with the reality of the situation, that there are probably eight to 12 million undocumented people in this country. And in a place like...

DOBBS: Congressman, can I ask you a question?

BERMAN: Sure. DOBBS: You just said undocumented people. Do you mean illegal aliens?

BERMAN: People who came here illegally, who crossed the border in violation of the law.

DOBBS: Where do we come up with this language? Who are we trying to protect or kid. Undocumented. They're illegal aliens.

BERMAN: You can call them a lot of different things. You can call most of them hard-working, taxpaying people trying to help our economy.

(CROSSTALK)

BERMAN: They came here illegally. They're human beings. Because

(CROSSTALK)

DOBBS: Congressman, I would not argue with you.

TANCREDO: They broke the law. You understand that they broke the law?

DOBBS: But we start with the first issue. They are illegal aliens.

Congressman?

BERMAN: All right.

(CROSSTALK)

DOBBS: I'm sorry. That wasn't particularly helpful, was it, to say, Congressman, to two congressmen? I apologize.

(LAUGHTER)

DOBBS: Congressman Tancredo, let me ask you this.

One of the things that -- and you as well, Congressman Berman. The fact is, Tom Ridge did say it. He said it out loud: Let's come up with a national immigration policy. We can argue about language. We can argue about numbers. We can't argue about one thing. We have a huge number of illegal aliens in the country. We don't have an immigration policy that either works, makes sense. And we don't have a party on either the side of the Democrats or the Republicans who seem to have the guts to deal with the issue.

What do we do here?

Congressman Berman, you first, please.

BERMAN: Well, Lou, I've listened to you for a while state the problem. It's the solution that's the difficulty. We have an immigration policy, but it hasn't been enforced. It's called our law. We allow a reasonable, generous amount of immigration through the legal system, based on family relationships, specific skills, and in keeping with the tradition of home for refugees and people who are fleeing from persecution.

The problem has been that we thought, in 1986, through the use of employer sanctions and a massively increased Border Patrol, that we would be able to deal with the problem of illegal immigration.

DOBBS: And full amnesty. And full amnesty.

BERMAN: And it turned we gave a full amnesty to probably 2.5 to three million people at that time. But the fact is, we weren't able to.

The single most effective tool to stop the crossing of the border -- there are other forms of illegal immigration, people coming here on temporary visas.

DOBBS: Right.

BERMAN: But for crossing the border, the single most effective thing we could do is to engage Mexico as a full partner in patrolling that border and dealing with the interior areas where

(CROSSTALK)

DOBBS: My gosh, Congressman, I have got to stop you.

And, Congressman Tancredo, you're freezing there and I apologize. But I've got to ask the congressman this.

A full partner? We couldn't have more of a full partner, could we? President Fox has the temerity to come to this country and, in three border states, tell people, governors, what they should be doing to provide benefits to simply state that he wants his people, that is, illegal aliens, provided for in this country, provided driver's licenses. That is one of the most remarkable statements I've ever heard from a head of state.

BERMAN: But we're not discussing -- Tom Ridge didn't talk about drivers' licenses and he didn't talk about providing

(CROSSTALK)

DOBBS: No, he didn't. He said, let's get an immigration policy.

BERMAN: What he said is, you have eight to 12 million people in this country without documents here illegally.

DOBBS: Right.

BERMAN: What are you going to do about it?

(CROSSTALK)

DOBBS: Let's find out from Congressman Tom Tancredo, who is freezing out there.

And I apologize.

TANCREDO: Here's what you're going to do, Mr. Ridge. You are the secretary of homeland security. Your job is to enforce the law. That's what you're supposed to do. Don't ask questions about it. Enforce it.

If you can't do it, find somebody who will. Find somebody else who can. And I'll tell you another thing. This just drives me crazy, this idea that, oh, we've got 13 million people in here; the best way to actually deal with it is to just say that they all are legal and to essentially abandon the border. It's ridiculous. We can enforce the law if we choose to. We have the resources. What we don't have is the will.

I swear to you that we could employ both the technology and the human resources to both our northern and southern borders, so as to actually enforce our immigration laws and seal those borders effectively. No, could we make it so that every single person that wants to come across is stopped? No. But could we stop this massive flow of illegals into the country? Yes. We choose not to. We choose not to.

That's the whole issue here. We actually want, as a policy, illegal immigration, because it provides cheap labor.

(CROSSTALK)

TANCREDO: You know it. I know it. Howard, let's go ahead admit it, because, if we want to stop it, we can.

And, if Secretary Ridge says that he can't, we've got to find somebody else who can.

BERMAN: Lou, this -- you can rant and rave all you want. I don't accept what Tom says.

TANCREDO: Well, thanks.

(LAUGHTER)

BERMAN: I don't think the secretary accepts what Tom says. We want to stop the illegal immigration.

TANCREDO: No, we don't, Howard. Oh, for heaven's sake.

(CROSSTALK)

BERMAN: Tom, Tom, you can say it all you want. The illegal immigration...

TANCREDO: I shall. I'll continue to say it as far as I can, as long as I can.

BERMAN: All right. Can I just interject for a second here?

DOBBS: Please.

TANCREDO: Go ahead.

BERMAN: Talk about homeland security.

You have eight million to 12 million people operating under false identification. We don't know who they are. We don't know where they reside. That is a very threatening system. We know certain industries are relying almost totally on the employment by these -- of these people; 90 percent of the people who plant and prune and harvest our crops in the Western United States are here using false identifiers.

They're subject to exploitation. They represent

(CROSSTALK)

TANCREDO: They're also subject to deportation.

DOBBS: I apologize.

Gentlemen, on...

BERMAN: Tremendous exploitation.

DOBBS: On the divide between exploitation and deportation, we are going to have to hold it. I hope you both will come back to discuss this issue.

TANCREDO: Will do.

DOBBS: Tom Tancredo, congressman of Colorado, thank you very much.

TANCREDO: You bet.

DOBBS: And Congressman Berman, thank you very much for being with us. Thanks, gentlemen.

It brings us to the subject of tonight's poll. The question: Do you believe the United States should legalize millions of illegal aliens already living in this country, yes or no? Cast your vote at CNN.com/Lou. We'll have the results for you later in the show.

Next tonight, we'll share your thoughts about the exportation of American jobs to cheap foreign labor markets.

Also, our special report celebrating those Americans whose hard work keeps this country running. Tonight, a California garbage hauler whose workday begins well before dawn. Casey Wian has his story coming up next.

Please stay with us.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

DOBBS: We continue to update our list of companies we've confirmed to be exporting jobs to cheap foreign labor marks. These are companies sending those jobs overseas or choosing to employ cheap foreign labor, instead of employing U.S. workers.

We're asking for your help in identify the companies still. We've received thousand of e-mail. And I have to tell you, it's going to be taking us weeks. We will be taking weeks and weeks to confirm these notifications.

Tonight, we're adding to the list of companies. Again, all of these we have confirmed to be exporting America. And here we go. And bear with us. It's a huge list, and, in yellow, the new additions, 3M, Adaptec. That's a computer networking company in Milpitas, California, Advanced Micro Devices, Alcoa, Bechtel, Charles Schwab, ChevronTexaco, Cooper Tools. That manufactures assembly equipment. It's based in Lexington, South Carolina. Covad Communications, an Internet and online service provider based in Santa Clara, California. Ford Motor, JDS Uniphase, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Motorola, New York Life insurance company, Otis Elevator, the nation's No. 1 maker of elevators and a subsidiary of United Technologies, SBC Communications, Solectron Corporation, a contracts electronic manufacturer again based in Milpitas, California.

Well, please continue sending us the names of those companies you know to be exporting America." Send them to us at LouDobbs@CNN.com. We'll continue to report on them, as we confirm each one of those companies each evening right here.

Taking a look now at some of your thoughts on "Exporting America."

From Willits, California: "It amazes me that the majority of people can see what the politicians and economic advisers can't. We see our borders be invaded by illegals and our jobs being sent to other countries. Yet the people who could and should stop it refuse to do anything" -- Rose Lewis Foster.

From Newmarket, New Hampshire: "Your show on exporting America is long overdue and greatly appreciated by those who make an honest effort to buy American. When shopping, I always look for the made-in- America label" -- Bill Blank.

From Chicago, Illinois: "Lou, I was quite surprised to see your show, 'Exporting America,' whining and whining about how Americans lose jobs to foreign countries, but did not even mention the underlying reason. Foreign goods are simply and cheaper. Foreigners work much harder and they're better educated in high-tech industries. It all boils down to competition. And the United States is losing" -- Sean Lee.

From Carmel, New York: "Why is it good to expert U.S. jobs overseas in the name of free trade, but bad for U.S. citizens to buy drugs from Canada and overseas at lower prices than are available in the United States? Is free trade only good when it benefits large corporations and executives?" -- Rick Boehme.

And from Forestville, California: "Lou, how you talk about 'Exporting America," then the following ad is from Deutsche Bank asking us to give them our money? How about a Miller Beer ad or something American, anyway?" -- George Quarles.

Well, actually, George, South African Breweries bought Miller Brewing in July of last year. So Miller is technically no longer truly an American company. But we get your point.

We love hearing from you. E-mail us at LouDobbs@CNN.com.
191 posted on 12/11/2003 8:06:13 AM PST by JustPiper (Teach the Children to fight Liberalism ! They will be voting in 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Dog; gubamyster; FairOpinion; FoxFang; FITZ; moehoward; Nea Wood; Joe Hadenuf; sangoo; ...
See transcript in above post also

Dobbs has got a poll but I cannot vote on this site for some reason:

LOU DOBBS TONIGHT QUICKVOTE
Do you believe millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States should be legalized?
Yes
No
Vote Here

192 posted on 12/11/2003 8:09:53 AM PST by JustPiper (Teach the Children to fight Liberalism ! They will be voting in 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Follow the law is what I would want everyone to do. There are lawful ways to effect citizen's arrests, and there are lawful ways to enter other people's property, just as there are lawful ways to enter the country.

Yes, yes, whatever you say. Now stand against the wall Gringo, unless you're ready to tell us where the women are hiding....

Fair use policy applies:

http://www.stevequayle.com/News.ale...ina.troops.html

Residents of New Mexico, just north of the border with Mexico, report that Chinese troops are operating out of northern Mexico and frequently make incursions into the United States.

Two U.S. Border Patrol agents, who have spoken on the condition of anonymity, fearing they will lose their jobs, said they have seen Chinese troops on the northern side of the border and that they have duly reported the situation to their headquarters. The agents said large numbers of the troops are frequently on U.S. territory about 32 miles southwest of Las Cruces, N.M., near the town of Deming.

The Border Patrol, U.S. Customs Service and the Luna County, N.M. Sheriff's Department officially claims no knowledge of the incidents.

However, the Border Patrol and local law enforcement have previously reported to local news media that Asian-appearing soldiers in military-style uniforms have been seen with Mexican troops along the border, and on one occasion exchanged gunfire with U.S. officers on the U.S. side of the border.

American Free Press previously reported the sightings of oriental-speaking troops on American territory.

In this recent case, however, the Chinese troops are reported to be in large units, in full uniform and not accompanied by Mexican troops.

The Border Patrol officers say they have informed their headquarters of the foreign troops on U.S. territory. Following their disclosure, a unit of U.S. Marines---or individuals dressed like Marines---joined the Border Patrol officers and engaged the Chinese troops in conversation. Officially there are no Marine units based in the area.

Front companies for the Chinese government have established a large port and airport in Freeport, Bahamas, and their presence has been reported in other areas of the Caribbean and Central America, including Cuba.

China has been reported to be interested in taking over a giant, high-tech electronics spy center, which has been operated for years by the Russians near Lourdes, Cuba, and has been eavesdropping on U.S. telephone and radio communications all along the East Coast.

By Mike Blair, American Free Press 12/8/2003
http://www.americanfreepress.net/

193 posted on 12/11/2003 8:14:09 AM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: archy
Please everyone. Write to your senators and tell them you as an American want better security on the border. If enough of us do it, it may be possible to get a few to listen.

I know most of Congress are corporatist sellouts, but every once and a while someone listens.
194 posted on 12/11/2003 8:32:08 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
thx for the heads up...voted no, of course...79% say no as well. this is bull crap
195 posted on 12/11/2003 8:46:20 AM PST by jonalvy44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
So I guess my husband and I deserve jail time too? Two Sundays ago, we went for a walk down our road and the dogs went through the fence after a pack of about 10 illegals that were sitting there waiting for a ride. The road runs right along the fence of an uninhabited (except for cows) piece of ranchland. They scattered but the dogs kept after them. The dogs are not trained to do this but they know who belongs in the neighborhood. Hubby crossed the fence to get the dogs away and convinced the four guys left to follow him. We called BP for a pick up. The next night, the same thing happened only hubby was alone and appearently interupted a pickup by coyotes. They tried to run him over. This time one got left behind and again the BP was called. So was the sheriff. He instructed my hubby (who is disabled and can not move very fast) to carry at all times and to shoot anyone who tries to run over him or threatens him in any manner.

This is taking place on a public street (i.e. not "our property") in a neighborhood that is pretty densely populated. Several of our neighbors have had thier cars and homes broken into and stuff stolen. Our daughters can not walk down the street even in daylight hours because the Mexican idea of consent and legal age are so very different from ours. Any female of any age is fair game. If you don't believe that check out any of the bars across the line. Sunday and Monday were the quietest evenings we have spent in a long time. Without the illegals walking through the neighborhood, the dogs had nothing to bark at. For those that live in SV and thik they are safe from this mess, we live off of Moson road in what is still considered SV. We are not that far from town. The United States of America is our property and deserves our protection. The BP can not be everywhere at once. Most of our neighborhood feels the same way.

It is stated in the article that the guy did not ask them to leave or make a complaint at the time. I am willing to bet that his property is not posted either. These people need to lay off the Barnetts. They are heros.
196 posted on 12/11/2003 8:49:43 AM PST by AZHSer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles; Pitchfork
Sorry ridesthemiles. Meant that for the original poster of the the comment.
197 posted on 12/11/2003 8:52:37 AM PST by AZHSer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Voted No. 79% no. 3190 no votes.
198 posted on 12/11/2003 8:53:11 AM PST by texastoo (What a Continent!!! (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
People in the border states need to make a state law that prevents such lawsuits. Make this a state referendum so the politicians can not screw with it. Rise up and unite people of AZ and NM, you have something that the Immigration Advocate Groups do not have, the VOTES.
199 posted on 12/11/2003 9:51:58 AM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
"...Donald J. Mackenzie, groundskeeper for and vice president of Summerland Monastery Inc.,..."


Perhaps this man represents a monastery that is part of the "People's Church" within the SJ's (cf. Malachi Martin's material)?
200 posted on 12/11/2003 10:40:08 AM PST by sully777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson