Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dolphy
Thanks for pointing out the facts about Republicans not controlling the Senate which was missed by the poster. It was veto proof so there was absolutely no reason for Bush to veto and have his veto overturned. That seems to be missing on here!

Political risk was not worth it IMO!
91 posted on 12/10/2003 8:23:20 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: PhiKapMom
60-40 in the senate, you need 2/3s to override a veto.

Veto would not have been overridden. Bush screwed conservatives, yet again.
95 posted on 12/10/2003 8:26:09 PM PST by TheAngryClam (Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Dolphy
Have you noticed that some of these posters are sounding like the Bush hating democRATs at DU and RATs.com? Could it be? Are they really conservative or are they here to try and split conservatives with their posts that sound like the Bush was selected not elected crowd.

96 posted on 12/10/2003 8:26:28 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson