To: Dolphy
Thanks for pointing out the facts about Republicans not controlling the Senate which was missed by the poster. It was veto proof so there was absolutely no reason for Bush to veto and have his veto overturned. That seems to be missing on here!
Political risk was not worth it IMO!
91 posted on
12/10/2003 8:23:20 PM PST by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
To: PhiKapMom
60-40 in the senate, you need 2/3s to override a veto.
Veto would not have been overridden. Bush screwed conservatives, yet again.
95 posted on
12/10/2003 8:26:09 PM PST by
TheAngryClam
(Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
To: Dolphy
Have you noticed that some of these posters are sounding like the Bush hating democRATs at DU and RATs.com? Could it be? Are they really conservative or are they here to try and split conservatives with their posts that sound like the Bush was selected not elected crowd.
96 posted on
12/10/2003 8:26:28 PM PST by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson