Posted on 12/10/2003 3:38:38 PM PST by Davis
What a monumental task it is, making New York City's public school system worse, but worry not, it's well underway.
Diana Lam, Deputy Chancellor for Teaching and Learning, and her boss, former Microsoft antitrust prosecutor, Joel Klein, Chancellor, have already installed a reading-writing program based on a "child-centered" Progressive education theory exposed as preposterous more than seventy years ago. It is a program that utterly and proudly ignores all scientific evidence of the past four decades concerning the process of representing--encoding and decoding--the sound units, phonemes, of language.
Scientists in a number of disciplines now know quite well how children learn to read, that is, "...the critical environmental, experiential, cognitive, linguistic, genetic, neurobiological, and instructional conditions that foster reading development ... and the ... specific cognitive, linguistic, environmental, and instructional factors [that] impede the development of accurate and fluent reading skills..."
It's impossible to know whether Diana Lam is even dimly aware of the wealth of scientific evidence, including the results of functional MRI's of the brain, that demonstrates the falsity of her Progressive approach. (It's certain that Chancellor Joel Klein is clueless.) It would apparently make no difference to her if she knew. Her attachment to utopian-socialist fantasies concerning education and the world, together with her lack of intellectual rigor lead her into gross error.
Consequently, she has become an enemy of school success. In her two previous appointments to lead public school systems (in San Antonio, TX and Providence, RI) she never exhibited anything more than an ability to wring personal profit-high pay and high contract settlements when fired-out of her labors.
One can almost sympathize with the politicos who have responsibility for urban school systems and yearn desperately for non-white school administrators. So, yearning, they tend to hire the likes of Peru-born Diana Lam regardless of her actual record as educator. That way, the blame for the continuing academic failure of black and Hispanic kids will, they hope, not be attributed to white racism and certainly not to themselves-haven't they done their best to see that no child, white, brown, striped, or spotted, is left behind?
That way, when a memo written in egregiously illiterate, quasi-Ebonic English emanates from Lam's office, white pols can snicker and carry on as usual.
That way, they can stand up and take credit for political leadership, for dreaming up a whole high school exclusively for homosexual and gender-confused teenagers.
Alas, the stink of racism is pervasive. Diana Lam and a complaisant city administration, Joel Klein and Mayor Michael Bloomberg, particularly, are insuring the academic failure of at-risk kids. And now, Lam has decreed that kids who can achieve, who can flourish in spite of her, gifted kids at public schools for the gifted, chiefly the Bronx High School of Science and Stuyvesant High School will be closed as soon as she can get around to it.
In this it is clear that Diana Lam is following a socialist agenda requiring wilful blindness to individual differences and a fierce desire to level not the playing field but the players.
Kids are admitted to Bronx Science and Stuyvesant in Manhattan about a mile north of Ground Zero only if they pass an entrance examination. It shouldn't surprise anyone that there are few blacks and Latinos in those schools, since members of those groups are typically about 4 grades behind whites and Asians. (Yin Li, 17, who arrived here with his parents from Shanghai nine years ago and yesterday won the $100,000 Siemens scholarship prize for science, is a senior at Stuyvesant.) Is this "de facto segregation" sufficient reason for closing them? One has to wonder why a school may be reserved for homosexuals and the gender-confused and not for kids who have evidenced ability to perform at a high academic level?
Since the modern introduction by John Dewey in the second decade of the last century of the notion, there has not been one scintilla of empirical proof that there are academic benefits to heterogeneous ability grouping. There's no reason to believe that any benefit will ever be adduced. Clearly, heterogeneity makes instruction harder Nor is it fair because equal, any more than fitting an entire class with one shoe size would be fair. It's a rotten idea any way you look at it.
Diana Lam likes the idea, though. She tried, when she was employed in Providence to close Classical High. She failed. There are too many Bronx Science alumni-I am one-and Stuyvesant alumni-Tom Sowell is one-and there are a substantial number of sensible people resident in this city who will effectively protest this inane action. Diana Lam will get her walking papers soon, and the lamentable Mr. Klein will follow her. Then maybe, under rational adult guidance we'll take a crack at No Excuses public education. When you reach rock bottom, there's nowhere to go but up.
*********
Some people do learn. You did, evidently or you wouldn't be asking the question. I agree with you, so I must have learned, too.
I think Lam has learned, knows that what she professes is purest hogwash. The people who never learn are suckers like Joel Klein and his boss, the Mayor of the biggest assemblage of hicks in the Western world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.