Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMNESTY CRISIS: Fight Tom Ridge's new plan
Numbers USA ^ | 12-10-03 | Roy Beck

Posted on 12/10/2003 1:28:20 PM PST by Klickitat

The country needs your faxes and phone calls immediately and steadily over the next few days.

Tom Ridge, the head of the new U.S. Department of Homeland Security, yesterday advocated legalizing (giving amnesty) to 8-12 million illegal aliens.

Click here to read the story titled: "Homeland security
chief endorses legalizing undocumented immigrants."
"Click for article"

This creates an immediate crisis that must be met with massive outcry -- like the outcry in August of 2001 that stopped Pres. Bush's July proposal for a massive amnesty for some 3.5 million illegal aliens from Mexico.

The most important thing is shoot this trial balloon down as fast as possible. Show the White House that this suggestion is outrageous and will be met with contempt from the majority of Americans.

More in a minute, but first the action.

======================================================
SEND FAXES NOW
======================================================

We just learned of this article in the last hour. Anne Manetas is at the computer writing text for faxes as I write this. Over the next two hours, you will start to see various faxes to Sec. Ridge, to the White House and to key congressional leaders who can put a stop to this nonsense.

Please send these faxes from:
"Send Fax"

If you go mid-afternoon today (Wednesday), they may not be up yet, but be sure to come back and send this evening.

======================================================
CALL SEC. RIDGE AND THE WHITE HOUSE......NOW....and for a week
======================================================

Your actions are the most powerful when they arrive immediately. I am sure that Sec. Ridge made his statement yesterday toin a fairly small audience in to a fairly inconsequential audience in Miami never dreaming that the whole nation would seem to be calling and faxing his office by 3:00 this afternoon. The faster the phones are ringing the better.

But if you are reading this after 6 p.m. EST Wednesday, please call Thursday. For that matter, some of you may want to call again on Friday and again next week. If you are reading this next week, your calls will still be great.

It will be important for Sec. Ridge and the White House to see that this is not a flash-in-the-pan protest but one that grows and continues over time.

Our Capitol Hill team will be working with key staffers over the next 24 hours to begin getting their bosses to send letters to Ridge asking him to recant. And those of you who are regular letter-to-the-editor writers will be called on to fire one to all newspapers that ran this story today.

What apparently is going on here is that the open-borders side is trying to regain some momentum after basically losing everything in Congress this year -- even though its PR machine repeatedly persuaded the NY Times and other commentators to declare that people of all sides were part of a growing, powerful movement that indicated some major amnesty would pass this year.

======================================================
THE PHONE NUMBERS
======================================================

*************************
Secretary Ridge, Secretary Tom
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20500
(202-282-8000)

*************************
President Bush, President George W.
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20500
(202-456-1414)

======================================================
WHAT RIDGE SAID
======================================================

Your calls to both the White House and to Ridge's office should refer to Ridge's outrageous endorsement of amnesty as being a terrible signal from the Administration.

Obviously, it is important to give Ridge the ability to back down gracefully. Because of the confused, garbled thinking in his statement last night, he has room to do so.

The first good sign is that Ridge did not make his comment in a prepared statement or before an influential audience. It was in a Q and A. Second, his actual description of what legalization would look like is full of contradictory ideas. To quote the news story:

"A man who identified himself as Miguel Arroyo of Aventura asked Ridge whether he supported immigration legalization and whether he thought it would benefit national security."

Ridge answered:

"The bottom line is, as a country we have to come to grips with the presence of 8 to 12 million illegals, afford them some kind of legal stus some way, but also as a country decide what our immigration policy is and then enforce it.

The story said that Ridge "said he thinks the body politic is about ready to address the issue of the illegal immigrants, who he said contribute to communities and Social Security and pay taxes. He referred to a growing number of bills that would grant residency to some of those living here illegally. He said one of these, which would require all illegal immigrants to leave the country before applying for residency, is 'not workable.' "

Ridge went on to say:

"I'm not saying make them citizens, because they violated the law to get here. So you don't reward that type of conduct by turning over a citizenship certificate. You determine how you can legalize their presence, then, as a country, you make a decision that from this day forward, from this day forward, this is the process of entry, and if you violate that process of entry we have the resources to cope with it."

======================================================
YOUR PHONE MESSAGE
======================================================

You won't get much time to talk. Have one or two things that you absolutely want to convey and say them. Be prepared to say more if given the chance.

I'm sure that from reading Ridge's statement, you already have thought of a number of things you want to say. I'm going to offer several points for you to choose from if you don't have your own. These are not in any particular order.

1. This talk of legalization of lawbreakers from the top security man in the nation is an insult and a threat to safety of every federal official charged with protecting our borders. It gives illegals the incentive to do ANYTHING to get across and claim this prize. And it may insight millions of new people to storm the borders.

2. Ridge has thrown in the towel on law enforcement and says nothing can be done about illegal aliens. In fact, Congress has passed a major law each of the last two years to deal with this problem. These laws have not yet been implemented. When they are, they will make it far more difficult for illegal aliens to live in this country and begin to force many to move back home. Why is Ridge pre-emptorily undermining the very laws he is charged with carrying out.

3. Ridge's solution seems to be that you give all illegal aliens now amnesty but change our enforcement so that any person who comes illegally in the future will be dealt with. If you can deal with future illegals, why not just start dealing with the ones already here? In fact, the 1986 amnesty of 3 million illegals was said to be a one-time-only amnesty under the exact idea that Ridge is suggesting. There was supposed to never be another million illegals living in this country. Instead, another 8-12 million have come in hopes of another amnesty.

4. Ridge's statement sounds like two different people were controlling his mouth. One person sounded like a top law enforcement official who said, "As a country (we have to) decide what our immigration policy is and then enforce it." But somebody from the cheap-labor lobbyists or radical, leftist open-borders groups got Ridge's mouth to say that all the illegal aliens here right now should become LEGAL. The fact is that 80% of the people in this country and the majority of the U.S. Congress knows what immigration policy is -- if you don't have a legal right to be here, you should leave -- and they want the head of the Department of Homeland Security to enforce that policy.

5. Unless Sec. Ridge backs away from these statements immediately, there is no reason for Americans not to lose full faith and confidence that he has their security at heart. He is supposed to be the man above all others who will enforce our laws to protect our borders and protect us from terrorists, criminals and masses of uninvited labor that steals from the wages and jobs of the American people. In this speech, he sounds like the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Insecurity. He is a chief law UNenforcement officer. He is saying that somebody ought to enforce immigration laws someday, but not now. He is saying that he believes he is incapable of enforcing those immigration laws entrusted to him and that the only solution is to reward all the lawbreakers with legal status.

6. Sec. Ridge seems to suggest that illegal aliens should be made legal but not have the right to citizenship. Is he proposing a new legal status that allows people to work and live permanently in the U.S. but with never a chance at citizenship? What is he suggesting?

7. Last week the Department of Homeland Security announced it was killing the NSEERS program that caused tens of thousands of illegal aliens from terrorist-sponsoring countries to leave our country voluntarily rather than appear at DHS offices to register. Now, Ridge says that he actually wants all illegal aliens to stay permanently and be welcomed as contributors to the Social Security system. Has the DHS decided that it no longer will enforce immigration laws.

8. 18 million Americans cannot find a full-time job, yet Sec. Ridge wants to keep 8-12 million illegal-alien workers and their families in this country working. What does he have against unemployed and underemployed American workers. Why does he seem to be waging a war against American workers instead of against foreigners who illegally enter our country and threaten our livelihoods?


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: activism; aliens; amnesty; biggovernment; criminalsrunfree; foreigninvaders; foreignoccupation; government; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegalmexicans; illegalnotimmigrants; illegals; immigrantlist; immigrationstatus; insane; invasion; mexico; nannystate; nationalsovereignty; nationalsuicide; noborders; republicanturncoats; ruleoflaw; thewelfarestate; tomridge; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 last
To: goldilucky
Don't blame Tom Ridge. He's just following orders from Bush. Did you ever think you would see a guy charged with Homeland Security propose a policy that would make our country less secure? If you notice, Bush's lackeys are releasing news that Bush also is thinking of this.

The fact that Bush would release this news shows that there was insufficient outrage about Ridge's announcement.

What's next for Bush? Appoint Hillary as his new VP? Change the country's name to United Socialist States of America?

You've got to give Bush credit. Rather than just sending jobs overseas through his "free trade", he's now just proposing to bring the cheap labor directly here and have the taxpayer pick up the tab and pay the welfare checks to the family's of those who get pardoned.

181 posted on 12/12/2003 7:02:19 PM PST by baxter999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
First of all I don't look at any President of the U.S.of A. as "perfect". I don't put my loyalty in men who are gifted with the words of poison to subdue the sheeple.

Secondly, if my views are considered "puritan" it is because I believe in enforcing existing laws we have in the books rather than applying "public policy".

And the "zealots" are the ones implementing their policy measures which defy the laws of the United States.

Finally, I don't know much about Howard Dean. But I understand he was behind the siege of the Waco massacre. What a man he was. It takes a "real man" to attack innocent people. I hope he rots in hell. Same for the Clintons. Don't care for Gore.

But I like Tom Tancredo. And if those members of the House who think Tom Tancredo is "darkening their doorstep" with his demanding they enforce the laws of the land, they ain't seen nothing yet. There are gonna be lots of Americans darkening their doorsteps.

We are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of language, borders and American culture. Call that zealotism? If so, I seriously question your loyalty to this Country.


182 posted on 12/12/2003 11:32:30 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: baxter999
Don't blame Tom Ridge???

This guy is a traitor. He has got to go!

"You've got to give Bush credit. Rather than just sending jobs overseas through his "free trade", he's now just proposing to bring the cheap labor directly here and have the taxpayer pick up the tab and pay the welfare checks to the family's of those who get pardoned."

Credit for what??? Free Trade is screwing America just as importing cheap labor is screwing America. The whole idea is to lower the American living standard. Deport all illegals and screw NAFTA and FTAA. Both are destroying this Country for good.
183 posted on 12/12/2003 11:41:18 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper
Breaking point has been reached.

For us all -sigh-

No truer words have been spoken today. A bad day.

184 posted on 12/12/2003 11:52:07 PM PST by texastoo (What a Continent!!! (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: usadave
I don't remember Hitler's Germany gathering up suspected illegals and deporting them en masse.

If you cannot see the similarities between rounding up brown-skinned aliens, loading them on buses, and driving them away to an unknown fate and rounding up ashkenazi looking eastern europeans, loading them on trains and shipping them away to (a then) unknown fate then you are beyond help.

185 posted on 12/13/2003 8:31:06 AM PST by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
FDR did it.

Just because FDR did it doesn't mean that it is, or was, the right thing to do. 10% of the population in 1941 didn't have voting rights either, does that mean Jim Crow laws were OK?

186 posted on 12/13/2003 8:33:20 AM PST by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
The simple fact is that we took the land by immigration, rebellion, and invasion.
We cannot allow the MExicans to regain it that way!

Rebellion and invasion? The Mexicans are going to rebel and invade?

ROTFLMAO

Much higher probability that the US will annex Canada, Mexico and South America; which come to think of it is not a bad idea.

187 posted on 12/13/2003 8:36:13 AM PST by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: The Shootist
If you cannot see the similarities between rounding up brown-skinned aliens, loading them on buses, and driving them away to an unknown fate and rounding up ashkenazi looking eastern europeans, loading them on trains and shipping them away to (a then) unknown fate then you are beyond help.

Quit being so melodramatic. Driving illegal aliens away to an unknown fate?! You've got to be kidding! They would simply be returned to their own country, the country that they came from and that they belong in. You're the one who seems to be beyond help.

188 posted on 12/13/2003 4:48:13 PM PST by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: usadave
They would simply be returned to their own country, the country that they came from and that they belong in.

Well the point is moot after all. The US won't have a large-scale roundup of brown skinned aliens.

However, the point remains. If the feds did anything remotely resembling said round-up the press would have a field-day, the Liberals would scream and the party in power would be out of power.

'nuff said

189 posted on 12/13/2003 9:30:12 PM PST by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
I like Tom Tancredo. And if those members of the House who think Tom Tancredo is "darkening their doorstep" with his demanding they enforce the laws of the land, they ain't seen nothing yet. There are gonna be lots of Americans darkening their doorsteps.

Don't bet on it. It hasn't happened yet.

We are not a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of language, borders and American culture. Call that zealotism? If so, I seriously question your loyalty to this Country.

I could REALLY care less. If you question my "loyalty to this Country" you haven't read my posts. Period.

190 posted on 12/13/2003 10:33:50 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: NRA2BFree
Ping
191 posted on 12/13/2003 10:34:47 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
"Don't bet on it. It hasn't happened yet."

Oh really? Don't ever underestimate the American public.


"I could REALLY care less."

I know you don't care. That's the point. You really don't give a damn about this country at all.

If you question my "loyalty to this Country" you haven't read my posts. Period."

Yes, I DO question your loyalty to THIS country. Period!
192 posted on 12/14/2003 1:37:32 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
You really don't give a damn about this country at all.

Yes, I DO question your loyalty to THIS country. Period!

For someone who claims loyalty to Jesus Christ, you sure like to throw around a lot of nasty and baseless accusations at those who disagree with you.

Don't you the Bible says God hates a false witness?

193 posted on 12/15/2003 8:06:38 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
The false witnesses are those in the white house.
194 posted on 12/16/2003 11:45:13 AM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
The false witnesses are those in the white house.

Bush Bashing Libertarian Alert!

195 posted on 12/18/2003 9:21:54 PM PST by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Bush Bashing Libertarian Alert!

General NIMROD alert!

196 posted on 12/18/2003 9:23:53 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: goldilucky
The false witnesses are those in the white house.

Actually, I'd just call him a false conservative.

197 posted on 12/18/2003 9:24:37 PM PST by dagnabbit (Tancredo for President. Bush for Tijuana Mayor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
That's a good one cause he doesn't appear to be conservative to me...more like an international socialist serving on a global level rather than American.
198 posted on 12/18/2003 9:42:00 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
You know, you actually make me laugh hysterically so.
199 posted on 12/18/2003 9:57:34 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-199 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson