Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
Those of us that are conservative hoped for some change when 'we' won back the Senate.

I thought a virtue of conservatives was our realism. "We" dont have a majority, when there are 6-7 RINOs and 48 Liberal Democrats. "We" conservatives are still a minority in the House and Senate. Sure we have a republican majority, but we dont have a conservative majority. So we could have hoped for a change, and we got it on some issues, but not on CFR, where the RINO+LiberalSocialistDemocrat coalition won.

Bush hoped to defuse an issue and have the USSC bail him out. Bad move.

We need to be nominating only Scalia-type conservatives and not RINO/moderate judges that end up confirming liberal precedents. What is true of the courts is also true of our political primaries.

426 posted on 12/11/2003 12:25:33 PM PST by WOSG (The only thing that will defeat us is defeatism itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
"We" conservatives are still a minority in the House and Senate

Agreed 100 percent. My point was to ridicule the rallying cry used back in 2002 about 'winning back the Senate'. There's no use in winning anything with a bunch of scrubs even LBJ wouldn't consider conservative.

We need to be nominating only Scalia-type conservatives and not RINO/moderate judges that end up confirming liberal precedents

Unfortunately I don't see that happening. As far as the Republican party has moved to the left, I imagine they would have problems even within the Republican party on confirming another Scalia-type Justice

429 posted on 12/11/2003 12:31:00 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

To: WOSG
I thought a virtue of conservatives was our realism.

And the reality is, Bush has behaved like a Ted Kennedy-liberal on CFR and the Medicare prescription entitlement.

He has demonstrated that 1) he doesn't want the votes of conservative Republicans such as myself, and 2) he doesn't need our votes. He has looked at the upcoming election and decided that passing a trillion dollar entitlement program and restricting free speech in connection with federal elections will win him more votes from the middle-left than he will lose from the right.

Well enough. He won't get our votes.

448 posted on 12/12/2003 8:55:05 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson