[billbears]

Does larger font somehow change your argument? Or just point out that you have no argument? What's it going to take? A 'super duper' majority? 99 Republicans in the Senate? Those of us that are conservative hoped for some change when 'we' won back the Senate. To date, all I've seen is unconstitutional bills passed on a prayer one Republican placed Justice would act conservatively and enough government spending that would make LBJ blush. The point is that the possible nominations slated for SCOTUS replacement are moderate conservatives at best and 10-20 years from now I see no major change in the slant of the Court

[onyx]

You lost the debate before you started. The question was turned on its head, just to bait losers like you. Congratulations, sucker.

[WOSG]

Those of us that are conservative hoped for some change when 'we' won back the Senate.

I thought a virtue of conservatives was our realism. "We" dont have a majority, when there are 6-7 RINOs and 48 Liberal Democrats. "We" conservatives are still a minority in the House and Senate. Sure we have a republican majority, but we dont have a conservative majority. So we could have hoped for a change, and we got it on some issues, but not on CFR, where the RINO+LiberalSocialistDemocrat coalition won.

Bush hoped to defuse an issue and have the USSC bail him out. Bad move.

We need to be nominating only Scalia-type conservatives and not RINO/moderate judges that end up confirming liberal precedents. What is true of the courts is also true of our political primaries.