To: jimkress
Concerned Women for America's Chief Counsel Jan LaRue noted that the decision means less protection for political speech, the very speech the First Amendment aims to shield, than for pornography. Then that solves the whole problem right there. Political candidates can simply skirt the CFR regulations by creating pornographic campaign ads.
36 posted on
12/10/2003 12:59:47 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Alberta's Child
I feel all guilty... You made me LAUGH!
37 posted on
12/10/2003 1:00:27 PM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Alberta's Child
Political candidates can simply skirt the CFR regulations by creating pornographic campaign ads. Well the Democrats already promise to F' us.
Just paying my last respects to the first ammendment.
39 posted on
12/10/2003 1:03:56 PM PST by
NeoCaveman
(who the F is John Kerry?)
To: Alberta's Child
Has the Supreme Court decided yet if it is legal to sodomize a candidate 60 days before a general election?
43 posted on
12/10/2003 1:12:20 PM PST by
NeoCaveman
(who the F is John Kerry?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson