Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: warchild9
I have no problem with going to the supermarket, and I wasn't trying to draw parallels between hunting and butchering. That wasn't my question at all.

You said that remote dwellers have no choice and must hunt for their supper. I then asked, what about those who hunt for their supper yet DO have a choice, ie access to the supermarket.

And while I'm not yet sure that you directly answered my question, I do believe I have gleaned from your posts on this thread that YES, it is OK to hunt for consumption, just as long as NO FUN is had.

Is that correct?
86 posted on 12/10/2003 12:05:07 PM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: agrace
What happens when bears hunt humans:


93 posted on 12/10/2003 12:09:35 PM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: agrace
It's simple: hunting, for someone in the suburbs, is recreational, and that's sick. I've spent months in the Applachians (as an example), and we killed for our suppers, out of necessity.
It's the killing, not the consumption of meat.
It's the killing.
95 posted on 12/10/2003 12:10:07 PM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson