As someone who reads many legal opinions, are you sure you want to leave the interpretation of the full effect of a 300 page opinion to the average newspaper reporter ?
If the wrote 300 pages, I can only imagine what sort of bombs exist in the opinion.
I will wade through the whole opinion as soon as I can. As often happens when Scalia and/or Thomas are in dissent, I will read the dissents first so I really know what's going on when I start slogging through the majority opinion.
The press reporting on a decision of this length will, as usual, vary from marginally competent to absolutely clueless. Others may get their news from newspapers, but I have long since given up intellectual training wheels.
John / Billybob