[justshutupandtakeit]

Nothing slender about it.

It says what it means and if the "constitutional scholars" around here ignore it then their claim of supporting the constitution is as hollow and shallow as their legal thinking.

This ruling does not stop you from expressing your opinion or exercising your free speech in any way no more than restrictions on the right to yell "fire" in a crowded theatre.

Start your own newsletter, write a tv script, play, novel, short story, publish articles on politics if you can't play by the new rules. There are many ways to skin a cat.

Rather than hysterical reactions we should look at the RATS response. This won't even slow the lying juggernaut down.

[Labyrinthos]

You're preaching to people who haven't even read the 300 page decision and probably haven't even read the law itself.

[Kevin Curry]

Start your own newsletter, write a tv script, play, novel, short story, publish articles on politics if you can't play by the new rules. There are many ways to skin a cat.

Excellent point. All any of us have to do is set up our own national newspaper or gain control of one of the big television-cable networks and we can freely express our opinions on a national scale in the last few weeks before an election while the opinions of our opponents, who do not own national newspapers or control a cable-television network, are reduced to so much white noise.

We don't even need to do that. We can each establish an Internet blog in which we may publish our opinions to be read by exactly no one.

< /sarcasm>