Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican officials praise Gibson's 'Passion'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, December 10, 2003

Posted on 12/09/2003 10:15:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Vatican officials praise
Gibson's 'Passion'

Insist controversial film on Christ's death accurate, not anti-Semitic

Posted: December 10, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

High-ranking Vatican officials who screened Mel Gibson's controversial film "The Passion of the Christ" this past weekend came away impressed, insisting it is theologically accurate and not anti-Semitic as its critics contend.

Unanimous appreciation and approval of the film, which depicts the last 12 hours of the life of Christ, was expressed by members of the Vatican Secretariat of State, the Pontifical Council for Social Communications and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the group that oversees Catholic doctrinal issues, reported the Catholic news service Zenit.

Dominican Father Augustine Di Noia, undersecretary of the doctrinal congregation, told Zenit, "Seeing this film will be an intensely religious experience for many people. It was for me."

Di Noia taught theology in Washington, D.C., for 20 years, and served for seven years as the theologian for the U.S. bishops' conference before coming to work for Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger at the Vatican about one year ago.

Some Jewish leaders, such as Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, assert the film "unambiguously portrays Jewish authorities and the Jewish mob as the ones responsible for the decision to crucify Jesus."

"We are deeply concerned that the film, if released in its present form, will fuel the hatred, bigotry and anti-Semitism that many responsible churches have worked hard to repudiate," said Foxman, who broke a media confidentiality agreement after being allowed to screen the film in October.

Gibson sources told WorldNetDaily Icon Productions, the director's privately owned production company, is planning a release timed with Ash Wednesday, which next year falls on Feb. 25. Earlier reports had Gibson considering a release tied to Easter, April 11.

Di Noia responded to the anti-Semitism charge in an interview with Zenit, stating, "There is absolutely nothing anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish about Mel Gibson's film."

"Speaking as a Catholic theologian, I would be bound to condemn anti-Semitism or anti-Judaism in any recounting of the passion and death of Christ – and not just because of the terrible harm that has been done to Jewish people on these grounds, but also because … this represents a profound misreading of the passion narratives," he said.

Di Noia said he's convinced "once the film is released and people get a chance to see it, the charge of anti-Semitism will simply evaporate."

"The film neither exaggerates nor downplays the role of Jewish authorities and legal proceedings in the condemnation of Jesus," he said. "But precisely because it presents a comprehensive account of what might be called the 'calculus of blame' in the passion and death of Christ, the film would be more likely to quell anti-Semitism in its audiences than to excite it."

From a theological perspective, he explained, the film depicts the story's essential Jewish context, showing "Christ's experiences in the journey from Gethsemane to Golgotha, and beyond, would be completely unintelligible apart from God's covenant with Israel."

"The conceptual framework is set almost entirely by the history and literature, the prophets and heroes, the stories and legends, the symbols, rites, and observances, and ultimately the entire culture of Judaism," he said.

Di Noia commended Gibson for "profound spiritual insight into the theological meaning of the passion and death of Christ."

"Anyone seeing this film – believer and unbeliever alike – will be forced to confront the central mystery of Christ's passion, indeed of Christianity itself: If this is the remedy, what must the harm have been?"

The film powerfully communicates the "cosmic drama of which we are all a part," he said.

"There is no possibility of neutrality here, and no one can remain simply an onlooker in these events," said Di Noia. "The stakes are very high indeed – something that, apart from Christ himself, is most clearly intuited only by his mother Mary and by the ever-present devil."

Di Noia says "The Passion" properly places the blame for Christ's death on everyone. Looking at the film strictly from a dramatic view, he says, "each of the main characters contributes in some way to Jesus' fate: Judas betrays him; the Sanhedrin accuses him; the disciples abandon him; Peter denies knowing him; Herod toys with him; Pilate allows him to be condemned; the crowd mocks him; the Roman soldiers scourge, brutalize and finally crucify him; and the devil, somehow, is behind the whole action."

Di Noia said, "It is always a serious misreading of the Passion stories in the Gospel either to try to assign blame to one character or group in the story, or, more fatefully, to try to exempt oneself from blame. The trouble with this last move is that, if I am not one of the blameworthy, then how can I be among those who share in the benefits of the cross?"

Renowned Protestant evangelist Billy Graham has screened the film and says the movie moved him "to tears."

"I have often wondered what it must have been like to be a bystander during those last hours before Jesus' death," Graham said in a statement released from the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. "After watching 'The Passion of the Christ,' I feel as if I have actually been there. I was moved to tears. I doubt if there has ever been a more graphic and moving presentation of Jesus' death and resurrection – which Christians believe are the most important events in human history.

"The film is faithful to the Bible's teaching that we are all responsible for Jesus' death, because we have all sinned," Graham continued. "It is our sins that caused His death, not any particular group. No one who views this film's compelling imagery will ever be the same."

Gibson has signed a deal with Newmarket to handle U.S. distribution for the film while his Icon Productions will retain all rights.

Gibson has so far invested $25 million on the film. With dialogue in Latin and Aramaic, the movie will be subtitled. Original plans called for no subtitles.




TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; gibson; moviereview; passionofchrist; praise
Wednesday, December 10, 2003

Quote of the Day by dead

1 posted on 12/09/2003 10:15:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"We are deeply concerned that the film, if released in its present form, will fuel the hatred, bigotry and anti-Semitism that many responsible churches have worked hard to repudiate," said Foxman, who broke a media confidentiality agreement after being allowed to screen the film in October.

Translated: We are concerned that once this film is released, people will know the truth about the death of Christ and take it out on all jews, even though we weren't alive back then. We have worked so hard to portray history as fluid, living and subject to interpretation and this film will wreck all the we have done in that regard.

2 posted on 12/09/2003 10:27:55 PM PST by Indie (The Nazis were Socialists. Dean, you are a Nazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Some Jewish leaders, such as Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, assert the film "unambiguously portrays Jewish authorities and the Jewish mob as the ones responsible for the decision to crucify Jesus."

"We are deeply concerned that the film, if released in its present form, will fuel the hatred, bigotry and anti-Semitism that many responsible churches have worked hard to repudiate," said Foxman, who broke a media confidentiality agreement after being allowed to screen the film in October.


Well, from what I have heard (and I have not seen the film), this film is an extremely accurate portrayal of the Gospels. For all intents in purposes, the film "says" what the Bible says. Therefore, what is Mr. Foxman saying here?? That the Holy Bible itself is hateful, biggotted, and anti-semtic?? It sure sounds like it. If he says such horrible things about the film, and the film is based so closely on actual scripture, then by default, he must be saying the same vile things about the Bible itself. I can't believe I have to read such idiocy coming from a supposedly intelligent and educated adult.

I had never even heard of the idea that this group or that group was "responsible" for the crucifixion of Jesus until this guy opened his yap and started spewing out his brainless prattle. I went to Catholic schools for 9 years when I was growing up, and never heard ANYTHING resembling what Mr. Foxman said. The only thing that I had ever heard was that Christ died for our sins, that God willed it to be so, and that we should be grateful for his sacrifice, which resulted in our Salvation.

If Mr. Foxman had kept his mouth shut, no one would have ever thought of the silly things he has been whining about. If there are any anti-semtic attacks as the result of this film, HE will be the one to blame for instilling violence. And if any violence DOES occur, God forbid, I hope he is held accountable for it.

But I think that Mr. Foxman already knows all of this. I don't think even he believes the drivel he is spouting. It seems to me that he is mostly concerned with his own self-glorification. He sounds to me like an attention-whore who is out to get as much free publicity as he possibly can. Plus, since what he is saying supports the godless agenda of the left-wing news media, the are are more than happy to give him just what he wants.

How pathetic!!
3 posted on 12/09/2003 11:44:35 PM PST by Zetman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zetman
If Mr. Foxman had kept his mouth shut, no one would have ever thought of the silly things he has been whining about. If there are any anti-semtic attacks as the result of this film, HE will be the one to blame for instilling violence. And if any violence DOES occur, God forbid, I hope he is held accountable for it.

Though I don't agree with Mr. Foxman, I can understand his concerns

History shows that the Jews were blamed for many things, the death of Jesus being one of them

I don't know what you were taught in catholic school, but I was taught that the jewish people (of that time) did have a say in whether Christ lived or died

Now that does that mean we should hate Jews .. Of course not

Jesus was a jew, so to hate them would also mean to hate Jesus .. and were I come from .. that is a big no no

4 posted on 12/09/2003 11:58:30 PM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indie
Will they drop their objections to the film if they're promised that there will be no Christmas trees in the theater lobbies?
5 posted on 12/10/2003 12:05:34 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"There is no possibility of neutrality here, and no one can remain simply an onlooker in these events," said Di Noia. "The stakes are very high indeed – something that, apart from Christ himself, is most clearly intuited only by his mother Mary and by the ever-present devil."

On which side is Abraham Foxman?
6 posted on 12/10/2003 12:36:57 AM PST by Ant_biter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ant_biter
I forget to include those "Catholic" NUNS, priests and scholars who criticize the film and the bible as anti-semitics? Are some of them still teaching theology in the supposed-to-be prestigious "Catholic" universities?
7 posted on 12/10/2003 1:22:52 AM PST by Ant_biter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
"...the central mystery of Christ's passion, indeed of Christianity itself: If this is the remedy, what must the harm have been?"

Food for thought, and meditation.

11 posted on 12/10/2003 5:52:52 PM PST by Steve0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I don't know what you were taught in catholic school, but I was taught that the jewish people (of that time) did have a say in whether Christ lived or died.

I never got that impression from any teaching in the Catholic schools. Maybe my teachers just never came at it from that angle. Sure, the crowd that condemned Jesus was made up of Jews. They were right smack dab in the middle of the Jewish homeland (and of course, Jesus himself was a Jew), so by default the crowd was naturally made up of mostly Jews.

However, the impression I walked away from the Catholic schools with was that what happened to Jesus was mostly a manifestation of God's will. It HAD to happen. There is no standing in the way of the will of God.

So, I always had the concept that in that time and place, the Jewish mob was an instrument by which God's will was carried out. So, I never thought of what the Jews did as something they should be "blamed" for. It was foreordained by God, and could have turned out no other way. It was going to happen the way it happened no matter where the rabble was located - Israel, Rome, China, or South Chicago. Had Jesus been from Hong Kong, we would be having this conversation about Chinese people today, instead of Jews.

As a result of all of this, Mr. Foxman's grandstanding seems more than a bit odd to me. However, I do see what you are saying. But I still don't think Mr. Foxman should be so bent out of shape about it.
12 posted on 12/10/2003 10:49:57 PM PST by Zetman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zetman
I never got that impression from any teaching in the Catholic schools. Maybe my teachers just never came at it from that angle

It wasn't taught as an angle .. it's just part of the story of Jesus

13 posted on 12/10/2003 10:58:14 PM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
It wasn't taught as an angle .. it's just part of the story of Jesus.

To some, maybe. I never got that in 9 years of Catholic Schools, as I outlined above.
14 posted on 12/10/2003 11:04:27 PM PST by Zetman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson