Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
Dean denied he performed any abortions, and nothing other than his views on the issue and associations (guilt by association) suggests otherwise. Pathetic. Dean is unfit to be president, but this kind of thing can only help him. I disent. Off damned spot.

Dean has been caught in a lot of distortions of his own views re: Iraq, Social Security age and distortions of the other Dems positions. Remember when he had an ad that claimed he was the most anti-war of the crowd, and Kucinich took issue? He pulled that stunt about entering a tin-foil hat rumor about Bush, then explaining it off by saying he never believed it, it was just an example of the rumors.

Bottom line...Dean brought it upon himself. Anyway, if he had any moral fiber on the issue he wouldn't be associated with a group that advocated abortion, whether he was performing them or not.

53 posted on 12/10/2003 5:08:36 AM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: grania
From Lifenews.com:"

However, in an embarrassing moment for Dean earlier this year, he was caught exaggerating one story in an attempt to talk down the need for notification. During his speech to the annual NARAL dinner this January, Dean related a story about his days as a doctor:

“As many of you know I'm a doctor. I'm an internist, and I take care of all ages…one time a young lady came into my office who was 12 years old and she thought she might be pregnant. And we did the tests and did the exam and she was pregnant. She didn't know what to do. And after I had talked to her for a while I came to the conclusion that the likely father of her child was her own father. You explain that to the American people who think that parental notification is a good idea.”

Dean's problem? The story is false.

In an appearance on MSNBC's "Meet the Press" on June 22nd, host Tim Russert confronted Dean with the falsehood.

Russert: There's this article in USA Today: “Dean told a powerful story but left out a key fact. What Dean didn't say was that he knew the father was not responsible, someone else was convicted.” That's a pretty big omission.

Dean: I don't think it's -- omission. A pretty big omission, you mean?
Russert: Yeah. That’s a pretty -- to say that...
Dean: I don’t think it is at all.
Russert: To suggest her father may have been...
Dean: I thought it was. At the time, I thought it was.
Russert: But when you told that story, you knew otherwise.
Dean: That’s right.
Russert: Why didn’t you say that?
Dean: Because it didn’t make any difference.

Joanne Ciulla, a leadership and ethics professor at the University of Richmond, says Dean gave "the appearance of lying because he didn't reveal all the information."

54 posted on 12/10/2003 7:34:50 AM PST by Vermonter (no sweatshop labor was used in the production of this tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson