Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Shuts Out France, Germany for Iraq Work
Reuters ^ | Tue, Dec 09, 2003 | Sue Pleming

Posted on 12/09/2003 5:38:42 PM PST by Erik Latranyi

U.S. Shuts Out France, Germany for Iraq Work 2 hours, 19 minutes ago Add World - Reuters to My Yahoo!

By Sue Pleming

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Citing national security reasons, U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz has ruled that prime contracts to rebuild Iraq (news - web sites) will exclude firms from nations such as France and Germany that opposed the U.S. war.

Reuters Photo

Latest headlines: · General says US winning in Iraq despite attacks AFP - 46 minutes ago · Suicide bomber blows up car wounding 58 US soldiers at base near Mosul AFP - 1 hour, 16 minutes ago · Iraqi Council OKs War Crimes Tribunal AP - 1 hour, 31 minutes ago Special Coverage

In a policy document released on Tuesday, Wolfowitz said he was limiting competition for 26 reconstruction contracts worth up to $18.6 billion that will be advertised in coming days.

"It is necessary for the protection of the essential security interests of the United States to limit competition for the prime contracts of these procurements to companies from the United States, Iraq, coalition partners and force contributing nations," Wolfowitz said in a notice published on the web site www.rebuilding-iraq.net.

The move is likely to anger France and Germany and other traditional allies in NATO (news - web sites) and the U.N. Security Council who are being blocked out of prime contracts after their opposition to the war. They may bid for sub-contracts.

But the decision will placate countries such as Britain, Italy and Spain, which provided troops to Iraq but whose companies were excluded from the first round of deals that went to U.S. firms.

The contracts cover electricity, communications, public buildings, transportation, public works and security and justice. Additional contracts are also being awarded to oversee those projects.

TIT FOR TAT RESPONSES

U.S. trade lawyer Clark McFadden questioned the administration's criterion for the contracts. "Is this going to set a precedent where national security can be used to justify limiting competition?" he asked.

Procurement specialist Prof. Steven Schooner from George Washington University said it was "disingenuous" to use national security as an excuse and predicted an angry reaction from those nations excluded.

"This kind of decision just begs for retaliation and a tit-for-tat response from countries (such as Germany, France and Russia)," said Schooner.

But a defense official said NATO partners had known for weeks they would not get prime Iraq business. "This is not a slight. We still have many agreements with those countries and good working relationships with them."

Wolfowitz is hoping that excluded companies will put pressure on their governments to join the post-war effort.

"Limiting competition for prime contracts will encourage the expansion of international cooperation in Iraq and in future efforts," wrote Wolfowitz.

The document, dated Dec. 5, listed more than 60 countries eligible for contracts funded by the $18.6 billion appropriated by Congress to rebuild Iraq.

The list included Britain, Australia, Poland, Japan, Italy, Norway, Spain, Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, South Korea (news - web sites), the Philippines, Romania and Saudi Arabia.

Some officials had argued privately the United States should not limit international competition to rebuild Iraq, where the infrastructure has been shattered by years of neglect, war and post-conflict looting and attacks.

The roll-out of tenders to rebuild Iraq has been delayed in recent days while "high-level" policy decisions were being taken on Iraqi reconstruction and as lawyers checked that the final wording complied with U.S. procurement laws.

A defense official said he expected the new contracts to be advertised on government Web sites later on Tuesday or on Wednesday.

U.S. trade lawyer Roger Schagrin told Reuters non-coalition firms could still get business from selling material and equipment to the lead contractors.

"Much of the money is expended on materials. A British or U.S. company could get a prime contract and then buy 100 percent French materials," said Schagrin.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: iraq; nonallyfrance; nonallygermany; rebuildingiraq; wolfowitz
Score one for the good guys!!!!!
1 posted on 12/09/2003 5:38:43 PM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
already here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037218/posts
2 posted on 12/09/2003 5:40:47 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
yes it good news
3 posted on 12/09/2003 5:42:14 PM PST by GeronL (My tagline for rent..... $5 per month or 550 posts/replies, whichever comes first... its a bargain!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Oops! I checked, but could not find it earlier!!!!
4 posted on 12/09/2003 5:42:52 PM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
What goes around...
5 posted on 12/09/2003 5:43:05 PM PST by Killborn (I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037143/posts
6 posted on 12/09/2003 5:43:44 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
"This kind of decision just begs for retaliation and a tit-for-tat response from countries (such as Germany, France and Russia)," said Schooner.

Somebody ought to tell this guy that the door swings both ways.

7 posted on 12/09/2003 5:44:29 PM PST by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Remember that France and Germany led the fight against our steel tariffs by threatening tariffs against products from states that were marginal for Bush in the last elections.

This shows we know how to play hard ball as well.
8 posted on 12/09/2003 5:46:09 PM PST by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
Anyone coming out to trumpet the cry of injustice is a globalist-socialist, and an enemy of the US.

The US is not 'divided' about politics. The socialists are staging a coup, while conservatives are fighting to protect the constitution and way of life.
9 posted on 12/09/2003 5:50:16 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Matthews called Gore a neocon tonight. The Dean orgy has begun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
"Much of the money is expended on materials. A British or U.S. company could get a prime contract and then buy 100 percent French materials," said Schagrin.

There should be a buy American clause on certain materials.

10 posted on 12/09/2003 5:51:20 PM PST by Go Gordon (The older I get, the better I used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
"This shows we know how to play hard ball as well."

After the Dims go wild, smart money says this will not stand.

It is a mere political statement, and will never happen.
11 posted on 12/09/2003 5:52:45 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Matthews called Gore a neocon tonight. The Dean orgy has begun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

This one's for you France and Germany.
12 posted on 12/09/2003 5:53:28 PM PST by Beck_isright (If the UN left New York and the Demorats left D.C. forever, would that qualify as the 2nd coming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
The move is likely to anger France and Germany and other traditional allies in NATO (news - web sites) and the U.N.

Well, la-de-da. Pay backs are hell aren't they. Did France and Germany think we would forget?

13 posted on 12/09/2003 6:10:37 PM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
F em!
14 posted on 12/09/2003 6:12:30 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Its still a hot zone: No cowardly Frenchman would be caught dead there anyway.

Congratulations France and Germany! Along with bin-Laden Construction you comprise the big three losers in the contract bonanza, and fittingly!

15 posted on 12/09/2003 6:30:54 PM PST by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
Any US let contract typically has such a clause. I suspect this won't be the case in this instance, but I would hope that along with this decision is a "Don't Buy French or German Clause."
16 posted on 12/09/2003 6:33:13 PM PST by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Since they have no ground troops there, it stands to reason that other nations' troops shouldn't be giving them protection to make money from the rebuild.

Someday, maybe we can let their own troops stand between the hostiles and their nationals trying to turn a buck.
17 posted on 12/09/2003 7:07:01 PM PST by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
It's only fair, France, Germany, Russia, and Canada made plenty of money when they propped up Iraq's murderous Nazis for thirty years.

Tasty Manatees
18 posted on 12/10/2003 6:12:13 AM PST by TastyManatees (http://www.tastymanatees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson