LIVE THREAD: Democrat Presidential Candidates Debate (N.H.)

www.freerepublic.com ^ | November 9, 2003

[Howlin]

C-SPAN LINK

[McGavin999]

I didn't watch the debate, but I've just finished skimming the thread. These guys just make stuff up! Doesn't anyone notice that what they're saying doesn't even have a grain of truth in it? Are dems that stupid?...........wait......don't bother to answer that.

[Miss Marple]

Gephardt in the spin zone now, talking about who has realistic ideas. Says all states are important.

[Tamzee]

Yep, it is... compare Dubya to the freakshow we just watched LOL

[Carolinamom]

I'm currently reading Inside the White House" which really gives the personal information on the presidents, their families, and the climate there.....up to the clintons. Based on interviews w/SS guys and staff, the clintons come off as rude, arrogant, and most of all INEPT.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Gephardt ignores the fact "fly over" country consistantly goes Red.

[LisaMalia]

Oh my gosh, "DO YOU LIKE PETER JENNINGS?" The media has sunk to a new low.....gave me a good laugh though!

[visualops]

I'm listening to Victor Davis Hanson on Savage right now as an antidote to the debate idiocy.

[Tamzee]

We made it!

It was my first full debate, too. I've watched part of them before, but could never stand to see one start to finish.

I'm not looking forward to repeating the experience LOL

[A Citizen Reporter]

The reporters in the spin room are now trying to spin that Koppel was hard on them? Did these people see the same "debate" that I did?

[ShandaLear]

Weasley never blinks.

[StarFan]

Someone asking Dickie if Koppel was a little harsh. Harsh because he asked questions that haven't been asked before? Unfortunately I wish answers to his pointed questions were forthcoming but these people will never deviate from their scripts.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Coalition? Geez, we got 30 or 40+ countries helping with logistical support, and the only organization we have on OUR side is NATO.

[Carolinamom]

A commentator said that this was the 24th time that these ...(fill in the blank) have been together. I didn't know that it was 24 times. How many more will there beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?

[Catspaw]

No, they first asked if Peter Jennings' questions were a little harsh...Gebhardt said, "Jennings?" The reporter, who sounded a little sloshed, said she didn't watch the debate.

[Howlin]

Edwards blinks enough for the two of them.

[Rebelbase]

Check this out. Its the US Beaureu of Labor Total employment stats for 1993-2003. Look at Nov. 2000, before Bush took office and then look at Nov. 2003. There are 1.6 million more jobs in the country now than 3 years ago.

http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost

Skip Navigation Links		Latest Numbers
	U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics
	Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

	www.bls.gov		Search | A-Z Index
BLS Home | Programs & Surveys | Get Detailed Statistics | Glossary | What's New | Find It! In DOL

	Change Output Options:	From:		To:
	include graphs NEW!

Data extracted on: December 9, 2003 (8:39:55 PM)

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id:           LNS12000000 Seasonal Adjusted Series title:        (Seas) Employment Level Labor force status:  Employed Type of data:        Number in thousands Age:                 16 years and over
Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec	Annual
1993	119075	119275	119542	119474	120115	120290	120467	120856	120554	120823	121169	121464
1994	121966	122086	121930	122290	122864	122634	122706	123342	123687	124112	124516	124721
1995	124663	124928	124955	124945	124421	124522	124816	124852	125133	125388	125188	125088
1996	125125	125639	125862	125994	126244	126602	126947	127172	127536	127890	127771	127860
1997	128298	128298	128891	129143	129464	129412	129822	130010	130019	130179	130653	130679
1998	130726	130807	130814	131209	131325	131244	131329	131390	131986	131999	132280	132602
1999	133078	132860	132943	132969	133266	133424	133432	133540	133709	133974	134287	134497
2000	136609(1)	136637	136678	137312	136576	136953	136489	136644	136908	137078	137288	137620
2001	137846	137648	137763	137353	137036	136869	137006	136256	136858	136370	136218	136067
2002	135791	136450	136143	136196	136487	136383	136343	136757	137312	136988	136542	136439
2003	137536(1)	137408	137348	137687	137487	137738	137478	137625	137573	138014	138603
1 : Data affected by changes in population controls in January 2000 and January 2003.

 

Frequently Asked Questions | Freedom of Information Act | Customer Survey
Privacy & Security Statement | Linking to Our Site | Accessibility

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Postal Square Building 2 Massachusetts Ave., NE Washington, DC 20212-0001

Phone: (202) 691-5200 Fax-on-demand: (202) 691-6325 Data questions: blsdata_staff@bls.gov Technical (web) questions: webmaster@bls.gov Other comments: feedback@bls.gov

[Howlin]

Edwards blinks enough for the two of them.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Mr. Brady from the Brady Bunch in the spin room now.

[BigSkyFreeper]

Mr. Brady from the Brady Bunch in the spin room now.

[tapatio]

Alright!I have watched this inept group debate for the umteenth time and I still have not heard one solution to all the complaints they have against President Bush.All they know how to do is gripe and complain and not a one of them have a single idea rattling around in their brains.