Hopefully a lot – I consider myself a fun person.
I remember a thread where you disingenuously tried to position yourself as some sort of neutralist on this issue. Do you recall that? You were lying then, but at least in your attacks you are being more true to yourself.
I am neutralist. I was not lying. What attacks? What the HELL are you talking about?
I once typed in a description of myself that I “love God” when I meant to type “want to love God”. You see, from a sentiment perspective I want to have the complete experience of loving God and actually believing it but currently I don’t have that conviction. I have an open mind which is the essence of being a “neutralist” – I can see both sides unlike many evolutionists or many devout believers.
Creationist.
Yes and No (simultaneously). I believe it is possible the universe was created and I believe it is possible the universe evolved into existence. There seems to be more evidence for creation when it come to the creation of the universe (big bang) and the creation of life but there seems to be more evidence for evolution related to the creation of man.
Open-mindedness really freaks some people out – is that your problem?
There seems to be more evidence for creation when it come to the creation of the universe (big bang) and the creation of life ***but there seems to be more evidence for evolution related to the creation of man.that would appear in the 'record'.
(Talk about a chicken or the egg question!)