Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
Oh, I know. And a bear that has attacked humans needs to be destroyed. And while I can appreciate the need for thinning, I just don't want to see wholesale slaughter done in the name of human convenience.
8 posted on 12/09/2003 7:28:33 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla
And while I can appreciate the need for thinning, I just don't want to see wholesale slaughter done in the name of human convenience.

It will be a thinning even as a hunt. The number of bear permits will be limited first by the states harvest goals, and second by the unsuccessful hunters.

10 posted on 12/09/2003 7:32:34 AM PST by Kenton (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla
And a bear that has attacked humans needs to be destroyed.

Destroying bears after they attack toddlers is like prosecuting the terrorists after they blow up the building. It may feel good in a vindictive sense, but it misses the point. We know what bears do, just like we know what terrorists do. Once bears are comfortable in densely populated areas tragedy is inevitible. They must be preemtively destroyed.

11 posted on 12/09/2003 8:05:38 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson