To: presidio9
Oh, I know. And a bear that has attacked humans needs to be destroyed. And while I can appreciate the need for thinning, I just don't want to see wholesale slaughter done in the name of human convenience.
8 posted on
12/09/2003 7:28:33 AM PST by
mewzilla
To: mewzilla
And while I can appreciate the need for thinning, I just don't want to see wholesale slaughter done in the name of human convenience. It will be a thinning even as a hunt. The number of bear permits will be limited first by the states harvest goals, and second by the unsuccessful hunters.
10 posted on
12/09/2003 7:32:34 AM PST by
Kenton
(This space for rent)
To: mewzilla
And a bear that has attacked humans needs to be destroyed. Destroying bears after they attack toddlers is like prosecuting the terrorists after they blow up the building. It may feel good in a vindictive sense, but it misses the point. We know what bears do, just like we know what terrorists do. Once bears are comfortable in densely populated areas tragedy is inevitible. They must be preemtively destroyed.
11 posted on
12/09/2003 8:05:38 AM PST by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson