Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day 1: As Hunters Kill, Protesters Howl
NY Times ^ | December 9, 2003 | ROBERT HANLEY and JASON GEORGE

Posted on 12/09/2003 6:51:45 AM PST by Pharmboy


Keith Meyers/The New York Times
Wildlife officials at a weigh
station check a 200 female
bear killed by a hunter.


Keith Meyers/The New York Times
Protestors outside the bear weigh station.


Keith Meyers/The New York Times
Harry McDole and Jim Aumick Jr.
killed a female bear last
weekend.

VERNON, N.J., Dec. 8 — Thirty-three years after New Jersey's last bear hunt, hundreds of hunters armed with shotguns and muzzle-loading rifles tromped through a foot of snow on Monday in search of some of what could be as many as 3,300 black bears thought to be living in northwest New Jersey.

The six-day hunt had been alternately hailed as an attempt to cull a bear population that had grown to dangerous proportions and lambasted as a cruel exercise in human vanity.

Protesters, some in bear masks, and hunters were out in force after a fierce weekend snowstorm threw an unexpected wrench into the hunt. Bears live in 41 states, 27 of which, including New York, allow bear hunts. Connecticut does not have a bear hunt.

But the issue in New Jersey, the nation's most densely populated state, has been the subject of a handful of lawsuits and a welter of controversy. There was speculation early in the day that the snow would keep the bears in their dens, where hunters were forbidden by the rules of the hunt. But by 5 p.m., hunters had killed 61 bears, the largest weighing 498 pounds, the state Department of Environmental Protection said.

Martin McHugh, director of the Division of Fish and Wildlife, refused to characterize the first day's kill as high or low. "It's about what we expected for the time of year it is," he said outside a bear weigh-in station in Wawayanda State Park in Vernon. "We've got cold weather, and this is a conservative hunt."

Hunters who spent a futile day in the snowy woods said more bears would have been killed if the weather were warmer and the ridges and swamps of northwestern New Jersey were free of snow. After all, they noted, bears have not been hunted in the state since 1970 and have no wariness of hunters.

Bill Bender, 38, a hunter from nearby West Milford, said he had had no luck, even though he said he knew many of the trails bears roam near his home.

"It's just too cold," Mr. Bender said after stopping at the Wawayanda station to ask about the fortunes of other hunters. "They're denned up. They're just curled up in a ball somewhere. When it gets warmer, you'll start seeing them."

Harry McDole, 63, of Franklin, N.J., took the first bear, a 160-pound female, to the Wawayanda weighing station in midmorning.

"This is my fourth one, but it's my best because I got it in New Jersey," Mr. McDole said. He said had he killed the other three in New Brunswick, Canada.

"I've waited 33 years to shoot one in New Jersey," he said. "It's a great thing. It cost me only a $2 shotgun shell instead of spending $1,000 going to Canada."

Mr. McHugh, of the Fish and Wildlife Division, said about 5,300 hunters had received final state clearance to participate in the six-day hunt. Each hunter is allowed to kill one bear.

State wildlife biologists believe that 3 percent to 8 percent of them will succeed, meaning that anywhere from 160 to 425 bears may be killed this week.

The state's environmental commissioner, Bradley M. Campbell, has said he will stop the hunt at any point he believes that too many bears have been killed. He has declined to specify that number.

Mr. McHugh has denied charges by anti-hunt groups that the state wants to decimate the bear population. He said that officials are seeking only to slow the population's rate of growth. State wildlife biologists estimate that 600 to 700 cubs will be born by next spring.

The precise number of bears in the state is in dispute. Last spring, state officials estimated the population at 3,300. But experts hired by the state put the figure closer to 1,350. Mr. Campbell said last week that the number ranged between 2,000 and 3,000.

"It's laughable the state bear biologists would come up with that huge a range and use it as an excuse to have this hunt," one protester, Steve Heuer, of Hackettstown, N.J., said at Wawayanda on Monday.

Protesters said the event was appalling.

"I'm here because I've been calling, faxing, writing, and it doesn't seem to work, so I came out here," said Marylee Morinelli, 38, of Pleasantville, N.J., who showed up at the Flatbrook-Roy Wildlife Management Area with a video camera hoping to record the depositing of bear carcasses. "Our whole goal for documenting this is so the general public will have an outcry."

For most of the hunters, it was a long day.

The last time bear hunting was legal in New Jersey, Pete Hefferan was celebrating being part of the Roxbury High School graduating class of 1970. He was a hunter then, but for years it nagged him that he missed what he felt what was his last opportunity until Monday.

So Mr. Hefferan, 50, who said he had hunted on three continents and led African safaris for seven years, returned to the woods of his childhood in hope of finding the American black bear.

Rising at 4:30 a.m., Mr. Hefferan, dressed in a camouflage jumpsuit and blaze orange cap, loaded his truck with a thermos of his wife's creamy tea and his transitional Yeager rifle, a re-creation of a 1750 muzzle-loader.

Shotguns and muzzle-loaders are the only firearms allowed in the hunt, and hunters cannot shoot them within 450 feet of a home.

Even with the temperatures in the teens and ice crystals on his face, Mr. Hefferan seemed thrilled to sit in the cold for more than eight hours waiting for a bear.

"Any day is a good day out in the woods hunting bear," he said, despite seeing nothing more menacing than a very chilled squirrel.

Mr. Hefferan finally gave up just before 2 p.m., ending his hunt by first walking half a mile to a bear den that he had scouted weeks before. It is illegal to hunt a bear in or near a den in New Jersey, a restriction Mr. Hefferan agrees with. But he said he wanted to see if the bear had left its home, something that would have been evident by tracks in the snow.

"It hasn't even come out," he said. "They call it hunting, not a sure thing," he added with a hearty laugh as he crested the ridge of the den.

Opponents of the hunt had other views. "This is an extermination, not a hunt," said Steve Ember, a member of the executive committee of the Sierra Club.

Robert Hanley reported from Vernon, N.J., and Jason George from Cranberry Lake


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: animalrights; bearhunt; blackbears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
This is proceeding apace. And the additional good news: no injuries to hunters (the protestors screamed about the danger to humans).
1 posted on 12/09/2003 6:51:45 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I am surprised how much press this story has gotten. It was on CNN's crawl last night (spotted while stopping for Laura Bush on Larry King.)
2 posted on 12/09/2003 6:54:09 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
"I've waited 33 years to shoot one in New Jersey," he said. "It's a great thing.

I don't get that.

3 posted on 12/09/2003 6:55:40 AM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Protesters, some in bear masks,

Not too bright to be dressed up as the prey... but them anti-hunters never were too bright. My only prayer is that they don't run into any of the idiot hunters (yep, they do exist) that will shoot at anything that moves. Any incident will give the lefties some ammo (ironic ain't it) to use against gun owners and hunters.

4 posted on 12/09/2003 6:56:14 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Well, the libs/bunny huggers are going after hunters; they want to make sure this story gets a lot of ink. I just hope no one gets hurt and all the hunters stay safe...otherwise, it will be a whole new onslaught.
5 posted on 12/09/2003 6:57:04 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck
If you've never hunted that feeling is hard to understand.
6 posted on 12/09/2003 6:58:21 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
hundreds of hunters armed with shotguns and muzzle-loading rifles tromped through a foot of snow...

If I'm going after bear I damn sure wouldn't use a shotgun or a muzzle rifle. I think the idiot who wrote this doesn't know jack about hunting or guns. Typical liberal of course.


7 posted on 12/09/2003 7:00:29 AM PST by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
During the hunt, did they find out for sure whether a bear craps in the woods or not?
8 posted on 12/09/2003 7:02:06 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
It certainly would put the "dear departed" in the running for a Darwin Award.
9 posted on 12/09/2003 7:04:41 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The animal worshipers will always make an appearance when thier gods are endangered.
10 posted on 12/09/2003 7:07:18 AM PST by blastdad51 (Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy
During the hunt, did they find out for sure whether a bear craps in the woods or not?

We've had photographic evidence for decades.


11 posted on 12/09/2003 7:08:24 AM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Huck
The liberal press opposes the bear hunt or or supports it half-heartedly. They want to stir up public opinion against hunting in general. It will add fuel to their anti-Second Amendment fight.

It worked in England and now they are trying it here.
12 posted on 12/09/2003 7:09:49 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Translation for the mentally challenged.

He has been a New Jersey State resident all his life. He has never had the opportunity to bag a bear in his home state. Now he can.

GET IT???
13 posted on 12/09/2003 7:10:55 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
It appears that shotguns with slugs or muzzleloaders are the only firearms allowed in the hunt. This happens a lot in public hunts here in Texas when the 'wilderness area' the hunt is in is close to populated areas.
14 posted on 12/09/2003 7:11:45 AM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
If I'm going after bear I damn sure wouldn't use a shotgun or a muzzle rifle. I think the idiot who wrote this doesn't know jack about hunting or guns. Typical liberal of course.

Either can be quite effective. It's likely a state regulation, not uncommon in states with high population density.

15 posted on 12/09/2003 7:11:52 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
You can bag a bear quite well with a muzzle-loader of the proper caliber and charge.

Hawken Rifles run up to .54 or .60 caliber and can take cahrges well in excess of 100 grains of black powder.
I have a .54 caliber Hawken I built and proffed it with two balls and 150 grains of black powder. Lots of bears, including grizzlies, were taken with them. I also have a .58 caliber Enfield rifle that fires a 500 plus grain mini ball. It mushrooms out to over an 1 inch across when it hits a target. No doubt at all in my mind I could take a bear with it.

A rifled slug in a shotgun would have no problem in taking a bear.
16 posted on 12/09/2003 7:15:20 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
This hunt is in New Jersey, a state with a very high population density and a high bear population. The use of shotguns and/or muzzle loaders is a mechanism to reduce the possible shootings of humans.

It is also an Eastern tradition evolved to reduce the creation of expensive holes in private property (buildings, cars, livestock) when hunting in densly populated areas with thick brush/limited visibility.

My .300 Wby was built for long range hunting, which isn't the norm back East. Shotguns with 00 buckshot are both very effective and strictly a short range weapon, ideally suited for the New Jersey conditions.

The muzzle loaders used are not .50 cal. Sharps buffalo guns, either. As for a presstitute being a liberal - might I ask if 'liberal writer' isn't a bit redundant?
17 posted on 12/09/2003 7:16:44 AM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
That was a litle harsh. Additional info: the guy quoted is an avid bear hunter who has had to go out of state for all his bear hunts. It's so good to see the animal stewardship programs promoted by and paid for by hunters being successful such that the animal population goes up enough to allow (admittedly limited) public hunts.
18 posted on 12/09/2003 7:17:43 AM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
As a NJ resident, I'm glad to see the hunt finally taking place. The bears have become more bold each year. And regardless of what the activists say, there is no such thing as a "bear-proof" garbage can.
19 posted on 12/09/2003 7:23:01 AM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: green iguana
I guess I was a little too sharpe. Sorry. But all those anti-hunters, anti-gun people really get my dander up.
20 posted on 12/09/2003 7:24:12 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson