He was just an excitable boy.
1 posted on
12/09/2003 3:46:02 AM PST by
putupon
To: putupon
What a great defense. Why didn't Muhammad blame it all on Malcom X and Farrakahn and Keanu Reeves?
2 posted on
12/09/2003 3:55:13 AM PST by
angkor
To: putupon
The problem was that he played useful idiot to an adult with an evil agenda. Millions of people do this every day, in a political sense. Stupid, yes; insane, hardly.
To: putupon
Garbage
In
Garbage
Out
4 posted on
12/09/2003 4:03:09 AM PST by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: putupon
Thing of how liberals must be watching this trial. On the one hand, they have to want to let him go free. After all, he shares all of their values and hates White Christians as much as they do. On the other hand, they don't want to get shot.
How to decide?
5 posted on
12/09/2003 4:03:28 AM PST by
07055
To: putupon
Muhammad "taught him from very early on . . . that right and wrong are made up by the government," Cornell told jurors. Malvo "believed . . . that right and wrong is an illusion."If right and wrong are an illusion, then hanging Malvo for his crimes cannot possibly be wrong. It is morally neutral. Let's do it!
To: putupon
Nauseatingly predictable defense. I suppose that in the trial of John Muhammad, the defense will claim that it was Malvo who brainwashed him. But I don't think juries are in a mood these days to buy that claptrap.
To: putupon
People that believe that right and wrong are an illusion are prime candidates for the death penalty.

9 posted on
12/09/2003 6:11:53 AM PST by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: putupon
Did the members of Manson's group suffer from this illusion? What about Nazis and Japanese? Were they all insane?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson