No one of these candidates should make charges they can't back up with facts. No one of these candidates should complain about the current administration or its policies unless they have a better plan, or a track record of opposition.
What I can't figure out is why Gore might support Dean. Does he just have bad judgement, as with choosing Lieberman (for heavens sake, choose someone who will bring in some states) or is their some kind of deep-seated plan to have a reason for the Dems to want to lose?
I keep writing it...Dean as the nominee is not a good idea. The odds of him winning before he ends up in the loony bin are miniscule, but is it worth the risk?
I so wish someone would ask the President about Dean at Planned Parenthood and Bush would reply: “I don’t know. There are many theories about it. The most interesting theory that I’ve heard so far — which is nothing more than a theory, it can’t be proved — is that Dean not only performed abortions, he also raped three girls while they sedated for the procedure. One of them apparently died, it is not clear whether due to negligent procedures during the abortion or the physical trauma of the rape. Now who knows what the real situation is?”
Perhaps it's a personal thing and he wants to spit on the Klintons...