[AzJohn]

If you're really interested in learning about the case against Nawash you could check out this article posted here on FR. This would be enough to convince me not to vote for him: speaking at an ANSWER rally, opposing anti-terrorism laws, treating Palestinian terrorism as if it were just another political choice.

Regarding your contention that lots of people donated to Nawash so what's wrong with Norquist hosting a fundraiser: a lot of people did probably donate to him based on stuff like his website and (I'm betting) not being aware of this other information. He was the Republican nominee, after all. A host of a fundraiser is presumed to have a greater familiarity with a candidate than someone sending in a small donation. Not to mention that this association with someone who has terrorist-defending viewpoints is part of a continuing pattern with Norquist.

[Bob J]

C'mon. Another hit piece from FrontPage that has already proven a prepdisposition for disliking Norquist.

You'll have to do better than that.

[Bob J]

Regarding your contention that lots of people donated to Nawash so what's wrong with Norquist hosting a fundraiser...

No one that I can see has been defending Norquist per se, we're just wondering why the focus on him when security breaches seem to have been the rule of the day and by much larger fish than him.

[Bob J]

It's like fishing for crappie when the largemouths are snapping at surface lures in the reeds.

"It's not whether you can bend the spoon, but why you would want to".

The truth is out there. For a moment, take your attention off the details and look at the big picture.