To: AzJohn
Regarding your contention that lots of people donated to Nawash so what's wrong with Norquist hosting a fundraiser... No one that I can see has been defending Norquist per se, we're just wondering why the focus on him when security breaches seem to have been the rule of the day and by much larger fish than him.
530 posted on
12/14/2003 11:19:21 PM PST by
Bob J
(www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
To: Bob J
No one that I can see has been defending Norquist per se, we're just wondering why the focus on him when security breaches seem to have been the rule of the day and by much larger fish than him. Exactly.
532 posted on
12/14/2003 11:24:21 PM PST by
general_re
(Knife goes in, guts come out! That's what Osaka Food Concern is all about!)
To: Bob J
No one that I can see has been defending Norquist per se, we're just wondering why the focus on him when security breaches seem to have been the rule of the day and by much larger fish than him.
All right, then you call out who is responsible for those security breaches and flag me to those threads. I'd like to hear what you've got to say and who those "large fish" are.
To: Bob J
"No one that I can see has been defending Norquist per se, we're just wondering why the focus on him when security breaches seem to have been the rule of the day and by much larger fish than him."
How about becauwe he's the one we have the best chance to stop and he's the one who comes closest to doing it in the name of the GOP, conservative community, etc. And because he started it, abetted it along the way, and is still doing it?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson