[Sabertooth]

Why don't you be a man an accuse Norquist directly of what you think he is guilty of instead of selectively presenting information for maximum grandstanding and playing the cheap guilt by association game.

Why don't you address the facts, instead of complaining about them?

If the facts I've posted are selective, then post the exculpatory facts.

Incidentally, in light of your own complaints about ad hominems, (arguments to the man) at #356 it's sort of ironic that you make comments such as "why don't you be a man" and "maximum grandstanding."

Why don't you address the substance, with substance?

[Bob J]

Why don't you be a man an accuse Norquist directly of what you think he is guilty of instead of selectively presenting information for maximum grandstanding and playing the cheap guilt by association game.

(...crickets...)