At this point, Bob, you're just compounding your earlier errors. I've been more than clear, and anyone who wades through this thread will see that your questions have been more than answered, and that your answers are less than compelling.
I've posted information and links, and you've ignored all of it, suggesting that I'm "selectively presenting information."
Fair enough. Then there should be a much larger exculpatory fact set with which you should be able to knock concerns about Norquist right out of the park.
Go for it.
So far, however, you're whiffing.
You suggested that Norquist's objections to the use of secret evidence were similar to those of Weyrich and Keene, apparently unaware that Norquist's objections were related to Al Arian's brother in law, and that Norquist received an award from one of Al Arian's organizations.
You suggested that there was nothing wrong with Qatar's funding of the Islamic Institute, apparently unaware that while at times an ally, Qatar was simultaneously funding the families of homicide bombers.
Those are just a couple of examples from today. I'm assuming you were unaware of these things, because I want to give you the benefit of the doubt.
