[hchutch]

I have a hard time buying that notion.

There are far more people deserving that term than Grover Norquist.

To some conservatives, money from Microsoft is "dirty." To others, it's money from gambling interests. Who decides for conservatives which money is "clean" and which money is "dirty"?

All I see are a bunch of Mikhail Suslov wannabes who are going after Grover Norquist to settle real and/or perceived scores using the same logic that then-Speaker Tom Foley used to justify a taxpayer-funded fishing expedition on extremely dubious allegations from Gary Sick.

Nothign on this thread has convinced me that anythign else is there.

[ml/nj]

Who decides for conservatives which money is "clean" and which money is "dirty"?

Aren't some things patently obvious?

Did you have any trouble deciding whether the money Bill Clinton collected from the Chinese Communists at those "coffees" he held was clean or dirty?

ML/NJ