[habs4ever]

It's about money.

Norquist is a whore, and no conservative should give him a pass for his previous good works, if it inoculates him against the louche and dangerous company he prefers to keep now, to keep his franchise afloat.Got that, Bob? A guy that will still take dirty money deserves NADDA.

[Fred Mertz]

Norquist is a whore...

At least we agree about one thing.

[hchutch]

I have a hard time buying that notion.

There are far more people deserving that term than Grover Norquist.

To some conservatives, money from Microsoft is "dirty." To others, it's money from gambling interests. Who decides for conservatives which money is "clean" and which money is "dirty"?

All I see are a bunch of Mikhail Suslov wannabes who are going after Grover Norquist to settle real and/or perceived scores using the same logic that then-Speaker Tom Foley used to justify a taxpayer-funded fishing expedition on extremely dubious allegations from Gary Sick.

Nothign on this thread has convinced me that anythign else is there.