I disagree with you on specifics regarding homosexuality, as to:
1. homosexuality is a disease with a definite cure - I take it as a way that someone is, with a limited degree of changeability
2. what constitutes public or private behavior
3. what constitutes recruiting
However, I don't entirely blame you for being intolerant on many counts.
Of course the humane thing is to get them cured but if they won't seek the cure then they will bear the responsibility for it. Can't force someone to get better...
Human beings must be responsible in any case for what they are and what they do.
...you can only quarantine them away from the healthy population
I'm afraid you've once again stepped way out of line, in my opinion.
The data says otherwise. Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle (totally) see scripters database. As to being a disease, see DSM III it was dropped in IV due to political pressure Again see the database for articles detailing this
2. what constitutes public or private behavior
If someone else can see it, it's public
3. what constitutes recruiting
Any attempt to show 'homosexuality' as normal, healthy, fun, cool, hip or otherwise to be accepted is recruiting. Sexual molestation is recruiting. (see scripters database. most SADs were recruited that way).
me->...you can only quarantine them away from the healthy population
you->I'm afraid you've once again stepped way out of line, in my opinion.
We used to quarentine lepers and TB patients. Both deadly contagious diseases. What's wrong with quarentining SADs, also a deadly contagious disease? How is stating that fact stepping over the line?