[oceanview]

not sure how to read this one. what does Gore have to gain by backing someone who will most likely lose the election? Dean was going to win the nomination anyway, why wouldn't Gore just lay back, let it all implode, and then come right out after the 2004 election as the "co-front-runner" for the 2008 nomination against Hillary. What does Gore say now? "I lost in 2000, I backed a huge loser in 2004, so nominate me for 2008". It just doesn't jive.

[Smogger]

Um cause Dean has the best chance of winning the election?

Who has a better chance then Dean?

*crickits*

[aristeides]

Why did Nixon back Goldwater in '64?