"That is absurd hyperbole. What you are saying is that if the Red Sox wins one post-season game, that should be the same as them winning the World Series?"
No, all that I was doing was engaging in a simple little mental exercise to show that *you* wouldn't give President Bush credit for killing the Kyoto Global Warming treaty no matter what I did or said.
One can reasonably conclude that you wouldn't give him credit for anything else, either.
That clearly doesn't make you open minded or fair, much less reasonable.
For the last time, the US Senate killed the Kyoto Treaty. As soon as I brought up that inconvenient fact, you said that somehow XO's were used to enforce it. When I said that XO's that are not based on laws can be overturned in courts, you changed the topic altogether. Even if you find an XO that was overturned, it doesn't mean that you ended Kyoto. The US Senate can still ratify that Treaty. Winning one game in the post-season does not mean you win the World Series. Ask anyone here who is not a bona-fide Bush-bot whether I am being unreasonable.
On a more important note, if you were so convinced that Bush has killed Kyoto with his bare hands, you should be able to cite the XO right away. You don't need to do any research because you have must already done it to reach that conclusion. If you haven't and need to look up, why are you so convinced that he was the one. Doesn't make sense.