To: semiarticulate
"Killed the liberal ABA's role in vetting federal judges for Congress." Now that's done alot of good, hasn't it."Prior to Bush's doing that, the radically liberal ABA got the first pass at vetting judges, even before the President or Senate.
Do you honestly think that Pryor or Owen would have made it past their first cut under the old way?!
22 posted on
12/08/2003 12:56:14 PM PST by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
"Prior to Bush's doing that, the radically liberal ABA got the first pass at vetting judges, even before the President or Senate."
I think you and I agree on what or who we'd like to see on the court, but; in reality, what is the difference if a proposed nominee is blocked by the ABA or the the Senate?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson