"On a more important note, if you were so convinced that Bush has killed Kyoto with his bare hands, you should be able to cite the XO right away. You don't need to do any research because you have must already done it to reach that conclusion. If you haven't and need to look up, why are you so convinced that he was the one. Doesn't make sense."
There's no need for you to beg and plead. If you want *me* to do your homework for you by showing you at least one Clinton XO that forced federal agencies to behave as if the U.S. Senate had ratified the Kyoto Global Warming treaty (even though it never did), then *all* that you have to do is to commit to giving President Bush full and complete credit for killing that treaty (as soon as I deliver the evidence).
If you can't make that commitment, then why should I spend any time at all on you. After all, if you aren't going to give credit even when evidence is given to you (and to this point you've certainly not wanted to give any), then why *should* I waste my time with you?
There's no need for you to beg and plead. If you want *me* to do your homework for you by showing you at least one Clinton XO that forced federal agencies to behave as if the U.S. Senate had ratified the Kyoto Global Warming treaty (even though it never did), then *all* that you have to do is to commit to giving President Bush full and complete credit for killing that treaty (as soon as I deliver the evidence). That is preposterous. Ask anyone else if I am being unrealistic. You are stretching things like an elastic band. Do you know how stupid this sounds: "...that forced federal agencies to behave as if the U.S. Senate had ratified the Kyoto Global Warming treaty." I am not trying to insult you, but that is a stretch that no reasonable person can accept. If you don't trust me, ping anyone else who is not a total Bush-bot.
If you can't make that commitment, then why should I spend any time at all on you. After all, if you aren't going to give credit even when evidence is given to you (and to this point you've certainly not wanted to give any), then why *should* I waste my time with you?
Again, I don't think you have the evidence. Otherwise, instead of wasting all this time you would have presented the evidence right away.