[biblewonk]

Well you sure said it wrong. I think it is your skull that has a problem is you can't express yourself and then get mad at people who read what you say instead of what you mean. And then you want an apology and declare someone as your enemy. You need some medication or something.

[discostu]

No you read it wrong, because you know the land issue is a loser you continue to try to recast what I wrote to be about the money. Typical action for people who know they're wrong, spin the conversation away from their weakspots. Then when I aknowledged the dollar cost similarities you were stuck, so you LIED and said I didn't aknowlesge the dollar cost similarities. All I need is for you to take a long walk off a short peer. You lied. You know it. I know it. You're not going to aknowledge it so you should just go away.

[newgeezer]

Oh, well. FR's full of them. I have to admit, though, this one's unique. "Watts per acre" is a novel way of looking at it.

Surely his home uses up no more than 100 sq ft. of "LAND" per person. Any more than that would be a waste, wouldn't it? By the same token, most highways aren't nearly as efficient as train tracks.

The guy must lose a lot of sleep over all the LAND wasted.

But, since I'm not talking about Altamont Pass, I'm off-topic.