To: discostu
And by the data you presented that is correct, the dollar costs for wind and nuclear are about the same: they're both cheap over the long haul with a big initial investment. Problem is in the space of one good windfarm you could put multiple nuclear power plants and get more energy. As I said before, you are stating that a billion dollars worth of windpower produces 1/100 to 1/1000 the power as a billion dollar nuke. Is that not what you meant?
132 posted on
12/09/2003 8:11:09 AM PST by
biblewonk
(I must try to answer all bible questions.)
To: biblewonk
I was talking about LAND. Get it LAND. You're the one that keeps bringing in dollars. I'm talking LAND, where wind power is GROSSLY inefficient. LAND. Can youu finally get that through your skull?! LAND.
133 posted on
12/09/2003 8:15:52 AM PST by
discostu
(that's a waste of a perfectly good white boy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson