Skip to comments.
Schwarzenegger hit with lawsuit; claim alleges election eve smear of groper accuser
Smoking Gun ^
| 12/8/2003
| Anonymous
Posted on 12/08/2003 10:45:19 AM PST by B Knotts
DECEMBER 8--A Los Angeles woman who came forward during the California gubernatorial campaign to accuse Arnold Schwarzenegger of previous instances of sexual harassment today sued the Hollywood star, claiming that he, an aide, and his campaign smeared her as a convicted felon when she made her charges. In the below Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, former stuntwoman Rhonda Miller charges that the Schwarzenegger camp told reporters that she had an extensive rap sheet, a dirty trick meant to discount her credibility when it came to the harassment charges. Miller claims that the Schwarzenegger smear began an hour after she made her charges public, with campaign spokesman Sean Walsh sending journalists an e-mail directing them to the Superior Court's web site, where they could access Miller's lengthy criminal history. The felon in question, however, was a different Rhonda Miller. (7 pages)
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: accusation; calgov2002; gloriaallred; groper; groping; lawsuit; rhondamiller; schwarzenegger; smokinggun; wantsmorethan15min
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
12/08/2003 10:45:20 AM PST
by
B Knotts
To: B Knotts
Isn't it time to moveon.org?
To: B Knotts
This is a ridiculous lawsuit and the fact she's suing over this vs. the alleged groping itself tells you all you need to know about the accuser in this case.
3
posted on
12/08/2003 10:46:50 AM PST
by
Steven W.
To: B Knotts
I don`t remember him pulling a double Clinton (Groping and smearing)Yeah, maybe the groping, but I don`t remember the smearing. If so, hasta la vista moolah
4
posted on
12/08/2003 10:47:17 AM PST
by
metalboy
(I`m still waiting for the mass protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
To: Steven W.
I frankly don't know what to think, but I saw this linked on Drudge, so I thought I'd give everyone here a heads up.
5
posted on
12/08/2003 10:48:32 AM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: B Knotts
So the press doesn't do its homeworks and Arnold is to blame?
6
posted on
12/08/2003 10:50:58 AM PST
by
js1138
To: B Knotts
I believe that the confusion with another woman of the same name who had a long criminal history began with some LA radio hosts who made the announcement, but also made it clear that they hadn't been able to verify that it was in fact the same woman. When it was learned that the two people were not the same, the radio hosts issued an immediate on-air clarification. Arnold's team was not involved.
7
posted on
12/08/2003 10:52:38 AM PST
by
ZGuy
To: B Knotts
Attempted extortion.
8
posted on
12/08/2003 10:52:42 AM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: B Knotts
It begins . . .
9
posted on
12/08/2003 10:54:55 AM PST
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: ZGuy
Arnold's team isn't entirely uninvolved, but the suit still is garbage. Here's the deal as I remember it.
Arnold staffer puts out email to media advising something like, "If you go to such and such database and enter 'Rhonda Miller,' you will find out interesting things from public records."
At no time did the Arnold staffer say that any and all information thus learned was THE SAME Rhonda Miller. The likely fact of the matter is -- and not that it matters -- is that the Arnold staffer DIDN'T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT it was the same Rhonda Miller. (If he HAD known it was the same person, he'd probably have said so!)
10
posted on
12/08/2003 10:56:52 AM PST
by
pogo101
To: ZGuy
Arnold's team was not involved.
So you're saying that maybe the message sent by Sean Walsh to the media was forged? Or perhaps it was a different man named Sean Walsh, not the one who was Arnold's campaign spokesman, who sent the message?
11
posted on
12/08/2003 10:58:22 AM PST
by
drjimmy
To: drjimmy
LOL...good one.
12
posted on
12/08/2003 10:59:13 AM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: B Knotts
Someone needs to hold her upside down over an open toilet.
To: B Knotts
Tom Daschle McClintock is deeply saddened.
14
posted on
12/08/2003 11:03:57 AM PST
by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: samtheman
even her charges were disputed by people who worked with her. Lets find out who is behind the money to bring the lawsuit.
15
posted on
12/08/2003 11:04:42 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Young Rhino
You're blaming Tom McClintock for this?
16
posted on
12/08/2003 11:06:29 AM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
To: Pikamax
Lets find out who is behind the money to bring the lawsuit.
Ask the LA Times to look into it. They'll get right back to you. Sometime just before hell freezes over.
To: B Knotts
All that this means is that Gloria Allred was successful in her shopping for a new client. Period.
Just another example of a celebrity attorney finding a sensational case to argue in the media.
To: pogo101
What is the timing of the two events? The lawsuit says the memo went out on the 6th (at what time though?). I believe "John and Ken" were talking about it prior to that. They discovered it, told Walsh, then the memo went out.
I wasn't able to find the original post noting that John and Ken revealed that a "Rhonda Miller" had a rapsheet. If someone could find it, it might help nail down the sequence of events.
19
posted on
12/08/2003 11:26:03 AM PST
by
ZGuy
To: ZGuy; doug from upland
You're exactly right.
20
posted on
12/08/2003 11:27:31 AM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson