1 posted on
12/08/2003 10:45:20 AM PST by
B Knotts
To: B Knotts
Isn't it time to moveon.org?
To: B Knotts
This is a ridiculous lawsuit and the fact she's suing over this vs. the alleged groping itself tells you all you need to know about the accuser in this case.
3 posted on
12/08/2003 10:46:50 AM PST by
Steven W.
To: B Knotts
I don`t remember him pulling a double Clinton (Groping and smearing)Yeah, maybe the groping, but I don`t remember the smearing. If so, hasta la vista moolah
4 posted on
12/08/2003 10:47:17 AM PST by
metalboy
(I`m still waiting for the mass protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
To: B Knotts
So the press doesn't do its homeworks and Arnold is to blame?
6 posted on
12/08/2003 10:50:58 AM PST by
js1138
To: B Knotts
I believe that the confusion with another woman of the same name who had a long criminal history began with some LA radio hosts who made the announcement, but also made it clear that they hadn't been able to verify that it was in fact the same woman. When it was learned that the two people were not the same, the radio hosts issued an immediate on-air clarification. Arnold's team was not involved.
7 posted on
12/08/2003 10:52:38 AM PST by
ZGuy
To: B Knotts
Attempted extortion.
8 posted on
12/08/2003 10:52:42 AM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: B Knotts
It begins . . .
9 posted on
12/08/2003 10:54:55 AM PST by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: B Knotts
Someone needs to hold her upside down over an open toilet.
To: B Knotts
Tom Daschle McClintock is deeply saddened.
14 posted on
12/08/2003 11:03:57 AM PST by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: B Knotts
All that this means is that Gloria Allred was successful in her shopping for a new client. Period.
Just another example of a celebrity attorney finding a sensational case to argue in the media.
To: B Knotts
Since this "lawsuit" clearly implicates Schwarzenegger's constitutional rights of petition and free speech, the first move I'd make is to file a motion under California's "anti-SLAPP" statute, Code of Civil Procedure sec. 425.16. The burden will be on Allred to show she has a case. If she loses the motion, case is gone. Even if she wins the motion, Schwarzenegger can appeal and put the case on ice for ~ a year or so.
23 posted on
12/08/2003 11:48:38 AM PST by
Map Kernow
(" 'Hate speech' is just 'speech liberals hate' ")
To: B Knotts

Miller claims that the Schwarzenegger smear began an hour after she made her charges public, with campaign spokesman Sean Walsh sending journalists an e-mail directing them to the Superior Court's web site, where they could access Miller's lengthy criminal history. The felon in question, however, was a different Rhonda Miller.
Last minute smears: live by them, die by them.
|
28 posted on
12/08/2003 12:11:44 PM PST by
Sabertooth
(Credit where it's due: saveourlicense.com prevented SB60, and the Illegal Alien CDLs... for now.)
To: B Knotts

Give it a rest, Gloria.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson