Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chi-townChief; Lazamataz; mhking; rdb3; Trueblackman; BlkConserv
Actually, Tillman is a "useful" idiot.

Consider, as Laz did, that our government owns one third of all land in America. That land is not on the Market. That land isn't helping our economy.

So turning over 40 acres of government land as "reparations" or welfare or land grants or whatever...would soon inject a fair amount of wealth back into our system (after all, some of that land *would* be sold back on the Market).

In the meantime, such reparations would turn Democratic Blacks decisively against our enviro-radicals who want our government to buy up all private land. The Enviro-nuts don't want *any* land to be privately owned, and they want to fight any sale of public government land to the private Market.

Yet how could such PC radicals be against 40 acres of "reparations?"

Now admittedly, this is a pretty cynical way of thinking, but you've got to admit, the enviro-radicals would play their part in fighting such reparations (and that would have larger political consequences).

Sometimes, such as in judo and politics, you can score an advantage by using your own opponents moves against them.

Moving government land back into the private market would do that very thing, were we ever to become so cold-hearted and cynical.

Republicans freed slaves. It isn't out of the question that they could next free our land.

33 posted on 12/08/2003 10:58:37 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Ha!

Any more ideas like that I come up with, I'm sending to you. You publicize well. :o)

35 posted on 12/08/2003 11:00:42 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Southack
Only problem with your post is that (I believe) the Feds are not allowed to sell, let alone give, the land they own that is considered protected (marsh lands, etc.). How much of the land the Feds owns is protected? I bet it is quite a bit. Also, I can't see them giving parks away in plots of land. Aren't National Parks considered protected also?
53 posted on 12/08/2003 12:19:52 PM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson