[Joe_October]

Your argument is silly. It is not practical for me to analyze to cost of millions of patients over several decades to answer your question. And you know that. Your debating skills are exquisite. Hooray the victor. You must be right because I cannot perform thousands of hours worth of analysis.

Whoops, sorry, you didn't prove your point either. You just proposed it was not effective. You can't prove it either.

Yet, my personal experience as well as yours is that it is more effective.

Men that I trust over anonymous posters on the Internet also believe it.

Men that I don't trust are opposed.

I gotta' stand somewhere and for now, it's easy for me.

[NittanyLion]

Whoops, sorry, you didn't prove your point either. You just proposed it was not effective. You can't prove it either.

Let's be clear. You asserted your position as fact. I asked for the proof and freely admitted I don't know the answer. I merely stated the case may not be as clearcut as you claimed.

You've since admitted that you have no data to back up your position. And hey, that's fine - neither do I. That's why I say up front I don't know. Until you do know, I suggest you do the same in order to avoid further confusion.

I guess I'm just a stickler for bringing data to support your assertions of fact.