Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe_October
Whoops, sorry, you didn't prove your point either. You just proposed it was not effective. You can't prove it either.

Let's be clear. You asserted your position as fact. I asked for the proof and freely admitted I don't know the answer. I merely stated the case may not be as clearcut as you claimed.

You've since admitted that you have no data to back up your position. And hey, that's fine - neither do I. That's why I say up front I don't know. Until you do know, I suggest you do the same in order to avoid further confusion.

I guess I'm just a stickler for bringing data to support your assertions of fact.

178 posted on 12/12/2003 3:58:01 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion
Perhaps the words were too hard for you. In the abscence of a complete analysis which we will only see after the fact, I have:

...Yet, my personal experience as well as yours is that it is more effective.

Men that I trust over anonymous posters on the Internet also believe it.

Men that I don't trust are opposed.


I can't "know" everything but I can conclude enough to get to understand what is the best course.
179 posted on 12/13/2003 1:24:36 PM PST by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson