Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Hate to break it to you but Caucasian, referring to race, has nothing to do with Azeris and Armenians. It is derived from Caucasoid, which Azeris and Armenians are certainly a part of, just as Negro is related to Negroid and Mongol to Mongoloid(though no one would call an Asian a Mongol these days.)

13 posted on 12/08/2003 9:04:04 AM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Skywalk
If everyone else gets to make up a self-descriptive term, I can too, and I don't choose Caucasian, unless blacks go back to Negroid and Asians go back to Mongoloid.
18 posted on 12/08/2003 9:08:33 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skywalk
Hate to break it to you but Caucasian, referring to race, has nothing to do with Azeris and Armenians. It is derived from Caucasoid, which Azeris and Armenians are certainly a part of, just as Negro is related to Negroid and Mongol to Mongoloid(though no one would call an Asian a Mongol these days.)

Granted. But the PC police have gotten upset of calling "native Americans" "Indians" so much that the term "Indian" is now considered pejorative, even though we know that "Indian" means someone from the Indian subcontinent. We're just taking the natural extension of that. If "Indian" does not refer to the native people's of America, but to people from India and to use it to refer to native Americans is considered a slur -- well, then by golly, "Caucasian" being used to refer to white people is a slur as well since it refers to people from the Caucasus. You can't have it both ways -- "Indian" as a slur; and "Caucasian" not. Both are or both are not.

63 posted on 12/08/2003 8:44:26 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Skywalk
Hate to break it to you but Caucasian, referring to race, has nothing to do with Azeris and Armenians. It is derived from Caucasoid, which Azeris and Armenians are certainly a part of, just as Negro is related to Negroid and Mongol to Mongoloid(though no one would call an Asian a Mongol these days.)

Arabs, Iranis and Indians are Caucasian too, so the Caucasian club would be kinda dumb. They could have those of Italian, of English etc. heritage. An Asian club is equally stupid as a European club -- you gonna tell me a lebanese, an indian, An Uzbek and a Japanese have commonalities?
97 posted on 12/10/2003 3:49:34 AM PST by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson