To: Velveeta
Distaso said they hadn't introduced them at the PH, specifically for that purpose, to keep the evidence sealed.Yep, think you're right about that, yet "stuff" (evidence) keeps leaking out through the NE; i.e., blood on bedspread, blood on door facing; no pillowcase on Laci's pillow, pj's found in a bag, other dirty pj's found in Laci's undie drawer, etc., etc.--and all this was found on February 18, if I understood the article correctly. Seems that there is a contradiction in Diastro's statement and the NE article.
To: Sandylapper
"Seems that there is a contradiction in Diastro's statement and the NE article."
Good point but I'm not convinced that LE is doing all of the leaking. The defense could be leaking as a way of desensitizing people. It seems less sensational and shocking if we get details in bits and pieces, as opposed to all at once. Of course, I don't know who's leaking - I'm just throwing this out as a possibility.
169 posted on
12/12/2003 1:18:25 PM PST by
drjulie
To: Sandylapper
The NE article doesn't mention the affidavits for warrant for search though, for either the search on Dec. 26th or Feb. 18th.
If the NE article is based in truth (I did say *if*) then somebody somewhere is leaking like a sieve.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson