To: Sandylapper
"Seems that there is a contradiction in Diastro's statement and the NE article."
Good point but I'm not convinced that LE is doing all of the leaking. The defense could be leaking as a way of desensitizing people. It seems less sensational and shocking if we get details in bits and pieces, as opposed to all at once. Of course, I don't know who's leaking - I'm just throwing this out as a possibility.
169 posted on
12/12/2003 1:18:25 PM PST by
drjulie
To: drjulie
The defense could be leaking to push this change of venue. MG can whine that there have been so many leaks, they nee to go to LA, his part of town, to get a fair trial.
174 posted on
12/12/2003 2:04:12 PM PST by
Jackie-O
("The horror...the horror"- Col. Kurtz)
To: drjulie; Velveeta; All
Good point but I'm not convinced that LE is doing all of the leaking.Not sure about that at all either, julie, because defense would certainly have the "evidence" through discovery, but what about the theory that prosecution is going to use that the NE presented? Surely, prosecution has not told defense their "plan of action". Think it's these little tidbits make me feel a bit uncomfortable buying this story. Of course, I'm a skeptic. LOL
To: drjulie
Good point. Some of the pundits a while back mentioned that leaks will come from either side for exactly the reason that you stated.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson