To: Got a right to Life? . . Huh?
Killing people is unpopular. Granting women the "right" to kill her own children spins better and is far less visible means of controlling population. There's a perverse logic to this that has its origins in hell.
12 posted on
12/08/2003 4:46:03 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Aquinasfan
The most disturbing thing here is that the pro-death groups are planning to use international law, which no American has voted for or affirmed, to "enforce" their deadly designs. It is impossible to overstate how disasterous this could be.
Pro-abortionists have accomplished everything they set out to accomplish - absolute right to murder an unborn baby at any point in pregnancy for any reason or no reason. Yet one thing still remains: force every taxpayer to pay for it. The Hyde amendment, passed in the late 1970's, stands in their way and that isn't likely to be voted out. So they must use international law.
To: Aquinasfan
There's a perverse logic to this that has its origins in hell. I agree that this is largely a spiritual battle between the forces of good and evil. The two main challenges before us is convincing people to make good choices and changing the Supreme Court in preparation for a challenge to Roe. We need to be less timid about how & how often we attempt to protect the pre-born.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson