1 posted on
12/08/2003 12:40:33 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
It doesn't matter. You'll only read about this stuff in tabloids like the Post.
The mainstream media will never put this on the front page.
The radical left will never concede that GWB was right to go into Iraq.
The truth be damned.
2 posted on
12/08/2003 12:44:08 AM PST by
ppaul
To: kattracks
I can see why they didn't use them. Launching your chem/bio weapon from an RPG means you're in range too.
To: kattracks
4 posted on
12/08/2003 1:06:02 AM PST by
Timesink
(I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
To: kattracks
"The West should thank God that the Iraqi army decided not to fight"
Do all these clowns suffer from the Baghdad Bob syndrome? You know, the predisposition to make up stuff wholecloth? What happened to these weapons? Did they use the super secret cloaking device to hide them? Jedi mind tricks? Come on people.
6 posted on
12/08/2003 3:04:13 AM PST by
kinghorse
To: kattracks
This guy was an anti-Saddomite. He had a vested interest in getting America to do the dirty work of getting rid of Saddom. There is at least the possibility that he said what he had to say to get America to invade.
Before the flaming starts, I'm not saying there aren't WMDs, I'm just saying to take this guy with an appropriate grain of salt. Or ask him...commanders were given warheads...you were a commander, where did yours go? What commanders, by name, had them, when and where?
To: kattracks
Possibly hes telling the truth about the WMD. Possibly hes only trying to make points with the American Forces.
Many Bush supporters will believe him because its what they wish to believe. If the same colonel stated there were no WMD would they believe him? The proof will be in the actual finding of a cache.
9 posted on
12/08/2003 3:30:40 AM PST by
R. Scott
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson