Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FR_addict
Baird is going to lose this one. He gave the Schindlers no explanation, only a "conclusory" statement denying their (first) request for intervention. The appeal cites clear cases where intervention was allowed and the stakes were lower. There is no greater stake in the outcome of civil litigation than life vs death.
18 posted on 12/06/2003 9:46:05 PM PST by msmagoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: msmagoo
Baird is going to lose this one. He gave the Schindlers no explanation, only a "conclusory" statement denying their (first) request for intervention. The appeal cites clear cases where intervention was allowed and the stakes were lower. There is no greater stake in the outcome of civil litigation than life vs death.

You summed up the appeal about right. The ACLJ used previous Florida cases to prove all their points and why they think the judge erred.

I agree with you and don't see how Baird could win, except that this is Florida and the judges don't seem to believe that they have to follow the laws of the state.

20 posted on 12/07/2003 8:04:59 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson