Skip to comments.
Drunken driving on the rise
Sacramento Bee ^
| 12/06/03
| Editorial
Posted on 12/06/2003 7:56:24 AM PST by Holly_P
Edited on 04/12/2004 6:01:53 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
It will bring no comfort to the friends and family of Sharmelia Jeffries, but the tragic death of the 17-year-old Christian Brothers High School student at the hands of a repeat drunken driver is part of a disturbing national trend. After declining sharply in the in the early and mid-1990s, drunken-driving deaths have climbed for the third year in a row. Alcohol-related collisions, which accounted for 38 percent of traffic fatalities in 1999, the lowest percentage on record, have grown every year since then and made up almost 42 percent of traffic fatalities nationally last year.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: alcohol; drunkendriving
1
posted on
12/06/2003 7:56:24 AM PST
by
Holly_P
To: Holly_P
"
After declining sharply in the in the early and mid-1990s, drunken-driving deaths have climbed for the third year in a row."
Hmmm... George Bush has been president for 3 years now. And homelessness has been on the rise for 3 years also. This is terrible.
I see politics in every story.
To: Holly_P
There are alcohol (ETOH) sniffing devices that can smell the ETOH on your breath as you drive by. People with any DUI record should be required to have such a device tied into the ignition switch on their cars. If they have been drinking, the car won't run.
And before anyone calls the ACLU on me, let me state that I have been convicted of DUI twice and still think it's a good idea.
3
posted on
12/06/2003 8:08:58 AM PST
by
mfulstone
To: Holly_P
More b.s. "statistics". The fact is that they have continuously lowered the threshold for the definition of "drunk driver" each year, hence more 'drunk drivers'. Most states now have the .08 threshold, which means you're legally drunk after two beers. Which probably means the cop that pulled you over should have arrested himself two hours earlier.
To: TheCrusader
Amen brother. Safe drivers live in fear of having their lives turned upside down by a bogus DUI, which just creates the environment of corruption and political favors that enable hardcore drunks - the most likely killers - to continue to drive.
We are getting backdoor Prohibition, and the same old corruption and police-state environment are coming back through that same backdoor.
5
posted on
12/06/2003 8:23:47 AM PST
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: eno_
We are getting backdoor Prohibition, and the same old corruption and police-state environment are coming back through that same backdoor.
Where have you been it is already here with the WOD which most BOOZERS support
6
posted on
12/06/2003 8:54:16 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: mfulstone
"People with any DUI record should be required to have such a device tied into the ignition switch on their cars. If they have been drinking, the car won't run."
-----
I'm sure these could be tricked with a baloon full of air or a simple air pump. I don't know what the solution is, but a law requiring these devices wouldn't totally solve the problem. In fact, I doubt if any law passed would be unbeatable.
The way they made us safe drivers (way back when) was to show us blood and gore crashes in Drivers Ed. Scared the shavings out of me anyway. I doubt if those would even work today with all the blood and gore that is seen in today's TV shows and movies. People are too de-sensitized.
7
posted on
12/06/2003 9:10:38 AM PST
by
gooleyman
To: Holly_P
Drunken-driving fatalities rose from a record low of 1,072 in 1998 to 1,415 in 2002, from 30 percent of all traffic fatalities to 34 percent. None of these statistics approach the drunken-driving epidemic of the 1980s, when alcohol-impaired drivers routinely accounted for more than 50 percent of traffic deaths in the state. Nonetheless, the gains of the last decade, fostered by greater media attention to the issue and tougher laws, have begun to erode. The statistics that are cited here are utter nonsense, since they have absolutely nothing to do with "drunk driving." The NHTSA uses the term "alcohol-related" to describe accidents in which alcohol plays any role whatsoever, even if it is not a case of "drunk driving." For example, a fatal accident is considered "alcohol-related" even if it involves an accident in which a drunk passenger who his killed in a vehicle driven by a perfectly sober motorist. It also considers an accident "alcohol-related" if a minimally-impaired driver with a BAC of 0.08% is killed when a perfectly sober driver falls asleep behind the wheel and runs a red light.
8
posted on
12/06/2003 9:20:49 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson