Then if some white guy says "I believe in looking out for the interests of white people" the media, the politicians and the universities all scream "hatemonger! Racist! NAZI! You must be punished! You must be silenced! You are EVIL!" Then the forces of all of those institutions are directed against the heretic, and they are destroyed in any number of ways, personally, professionally and politically. If they don't wise up and shut up quick they usually end up in jail.
It's disgusting, it's craven, and it makes me sick.
It's good to see that Time mentions Jared Taylor's "American Renaissance". Hopefully, such mention will give them _more_ exposure, not less. And the more exposure they get, the more adherents they will get, as well. Their message is simply too logical, too powerful, and to timely to be refuted with the usual "hate group" smears.
AR has been my favorite publication since I was tipped off to its existence 'way back in the early nineties. You can get a sampling at amren.com. They also have a "best of" book available, containing an anthology of their best articles.
For example: this month's lead article is a comparison of the immigration history and policies of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Sweden seems headed for the abyss, whereas Denmark is taking fairly strong steps to discourage nonwhite immigration, particularly by Islamics.
The emergence of white "tribalism" (Ms. Swain's terminology) _must_ happen if there is any hope to save America "as the nation it was". Without the burgeoning of such "identity", whites will eventually be overwhelmed by third-world "tribalism" and culture. We are in imminent danger of demographical conquest by Mexicans/Central Americans (this does not have to be explained to those who live in certain areas of California).
Amreica once was a "white, Christian nation". Does anyone disagree with that?
If you accept this reality as part of our history, do you _not_ wish to maintain/restore America as such?
Cheers!
- John
Do you remember, by any chance, Hillary Clinton's statement (regarding the Pledge of Alliegance) that she could only pledge alliegance "to the America that could be"?
Believe me, "America as it was" is NOT what the left has in mind for us. I have a 23 year old homosexual nephew who is VERY much into the lefty-PC-race-gender reconstitution of America movement, and I have no reason to believe he is unusual (for the left) in his beliefs and desires which mimic Hillary's perfectly. His parents back him virtually 100 percent since they only important thing to them, really, is that he gets what he wants.
There are a lot of Hillary-style leftists out there committed to the brave new world of "multi-gendered, endlessly-RACIAL Amerika" and also an awful lot of sheeple who simply will not believe what lies in store for them if the left has its way with this country. It's already happening in the EUrinal and in KKKanada.